[Wireshark-dev] Missing updates to packet-acn.c

2009-02-17 Thread Bill Florac
Hi, There are a number of changes to the dissector packet-acn.c (and packet-acn.h) that are missing in the current build: 1.0.6. These were posted back in November (version 26827) and currently show up in the latest head. When should we expect them to be rolled into the 1.0.x build? Bill

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-08 Thread Bill Florac
I think you need to look further back into the nmake output. You should see this: -- cd .. ..\tools\lemon\lemon t=..\tools\lemon\lempar.c dtd_grammar.lemon flex -odtd_parse.c dtd_parse.l flex

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-08 Thread Bill Florac
PROTECTED] [mailto:wireshark-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Florac Sent: 08 November 2006 16:22 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file? I think you need to look further back into the nmake output. You should see

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ACN Source code

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Florac
Thanks for cleaning these up.. I should have caught the bitfields... I'm not used to all the cross-platform problems (but I'm learning... :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:09 AM To: Developer

[Wireshark-dev] Patch for ACN

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Florac
Here is a patch for the ACN dissector. It fixes a bug in acn_add_expiry() and cleans up some cosmetic things. Bill Florac Senior Technical Product Specialist Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc 3031 Pleasant View Rd Middleton, WI 53562 608-831-4116 (corp. phone) acn.patch Description: acn.patch

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Release 00.99.4 missing file?

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Florac
FYI, I don't seem to have major problems with the CYGWIN version of Python. I can build the latest using... cygwinpython 2.4.3 cygwinbash 3.1.17(9) microsoft nmake 6.0.0.8167.0 I did have to convert the following files to UNIX format. I expect it has something to do with the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ACN Source code

2006-11-06 Thread Bill Florac
Did someone finally get a valid attachments on this? I don't see them in the build yet. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Florac Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:08 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Source code for ACN (Was: (no subject))

2006-10-31 Thread Bill Florac
for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Source code for ACN (Was: (no subject)) Bill Florac wrote: Sorry for the duplicate posting, I guess there was a problems with the attachments on the last issue if this. I hope this goes better. Still no luck. Try turning off Rich Text Format. Or see one

[Wireshark-dev] ACN plug-in for Wireshark

2006-10-23 Thread Bill Florac
is if much use. Should I still submit a diff or just a submit a replacement. And, should it be submitted to this email list or added to Bugzilla? Bill Florac Senior Technical Product Specialist Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc. 3031 Pleasant View Rd . Middleton, WI 53562 608-831-4116 (corp. phone