ldbot now.
BTW g_tree_new_full is GTK2 only.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
nder 1 seconds even on a slow box (a
7 years old 500 Mhz G4).
So maybe lazy init these functions would be enough? Enforcing name there would
be easy.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
28,459 3,6 586208 _g_tree_lookup (libglib-2.0-0.dll)
Why did _g_tree_insert speed up from 1582,290 to 371,999?
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
[UTF-8?]On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:42:12 +0100, Stig Bjørlykke wrote
> 2007/11/20, Didier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Can you share a small capture?
>
>
http://wiki.wireshark.org/SampleCaptures?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=dmp-examples.pcap.gz
>
> Add port 2420
is called I don't see how flags.visited could be
false. cf file.c rescan_packets()
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
side effect of fixing
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1876
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
);
offset +=len;
or len +1, but you get the idea.
>
> { &hf_data_nbyte,
> { "DATA", "lon.datum",
> FT_BYTES, BASE_HEX, NULL, 0,
> "DATA", HFILL }
> }
>
Didier
___
DU you should always get the same number - however
> it is not unique to the session, only the tvb. To make it unique I
> add the seq field of the tcpinfo structure. The structure pointer is
> present in the pinfo->private_data for tcp dissectors, so I
t_method = "POST"
conv_data->request_method ="POST"
And you can precompute
(headers[i].namelen - 1)
BTW if you're in optimization mood you can play with
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization
I'm not sure it compiles for Window though.
Didier
__
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:56:53 -0700, Guy Harris wrote
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Didier wrote:
>
> > Is it ok if I upload the diff (~ 250 KB) in the wiki?
>
> From looking at the version you uploaded as an attachment to
>
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Developm
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:08:29 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
> >
> > When trying to attach a one line patch.
> Hmm, better follow the suggestion of Anders and post it on the Wiki.
Done at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization, currently only the
patch, writing some stuff ab
.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
undef error - Undefined subroutine Fh::slice at
data/template/template/en/default/global/hidden-fields.html.tmpl line 58
When trying to attach a one line patch.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
d 40 times faster.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
ignificant modifications of [your] own". However, I don't know
> what additional restrictions that'd put on, say, somebody re-
> packaging WinPcap.
Or you can ask Benoit, I know him and I don't see how it could be an issue.
Didier
__
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:13:17 -0700, Zongjun wrote
> On 9/27/07, Zongjun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hey Didier,
>
> You mean like
>
> gint offset_thisRound = 0; // of course, outside if(tree)block.
>
> if (tree) {
> myproto_item = proto_tree_add
Hi
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:02:32 -0700, Zongjun wrote
> Hey guys,
>
> According to my capture, I don't have situations where ONE PDU spans over
> multiple TCP segment. In stead, mine is the other round: Single segment
> having multiple PDUs.
>
> But using the folling code, what I observed is wi
Hi
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:02:32 -0700, Zongjun wrote
> Hey guys,
>
> According to my capture, I don't have situations where ONE PDU spans over
> multiple TCP segment. In stead, mine is the other round: Single segment
> having multiple PDUs.
>
> But using the folling code, what I observed is wi
ny times does not show any growth
in > > memory usage for Wireshark. If what you're saying is true then I should
see > > /huge/ memory leak each time the file is reloaded, non?
Yes you should.
Which glib version are you using? Here I'm seeing a 1MB growth for a 20 000
packe
Hi
Sorry but I can't use bugzilla. https (bug 192)
it's revision 21618 the culprit. pref reinit callbacks are only called if
prefs are changed or aren't the default so sometime http dissector doesn't
register itself.
Didier
___
W
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:11:20 +0200, Didier wrote
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:16:49 -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote
> > Didier wrote:
> > [That's not to say I don't see memory usage growing when I reload a
> > capture file, but I'm not convinced this is the source.]
&g
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:16:49 -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote
> Didier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1) It seems that since some glib 2.0 version g_mem_chunk_destroy doesn't
> > free
>
> The docs certainly seem to indicate that the memory should actually
> be freed:
f place it g_malloc address space
but many don't free it.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
(?) is true increment your global
counter and store it in the se_tree.
4) now you can use se_tree_lookup32_le for finding the sequence number of a
packet.
5) use fragment_add_seq_check as you already do with this sequence number.
Didier
=== modified file 'epan/dissectors/packet-dnp.c'
-
-iuup.c
I haven't tested this one, no capture.
Didier
Index: gtk/column_prefs.c
===
--- gtk/column_prefs.c (révision 22073)
+++ gtk/column_prefs.c (copie de travail)
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@
Gdk
Hi,
Le dimanche 10 juin 2007 à 17:44 +0200, Luis EG Ontanon a écrit :
> Can you test the attached patch --with-plugins=no instead
It seems to work.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mail
Hi,
I'm not sure it's the right way to do it though.
Didier
Index: editcap.c
===
--- editcap.c (révision 22041)
+++ editcap.c (copie de travail)
@@ -388,8 +388,10 @@
g_free(init_progfile_dir_error);
e on the P4 you have tcp checksum disabled and not on the
Itanium, tcp dissector doesn't reassemble packet with bad checksum.
Or it's a bug in checksum code/Itanium compiler.
Didier
> On the first machine, a P4, the command I run is:
>
> wireshark $ ./tshark -R nfs
On lun, 2007-05-21 at 14:54 -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:38:27PM +0200, didier wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to compile wireshark svn HEAD and I have warning, so error
> > like
> >
> > warning: comparison is always false due to limit
bugs?
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
for anomalies,
> This was one of them. Maybe I can pick up some more information when I get
> on site.
>
> What does ATALK_PS80211 2D-3 for anyway? Is it a device or AP?
No idea.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wires
1 byte + 4 bytes, follow by the zone name.
What is it? A Zyxel NAS or router? If ATALK_PS8011 2D-3 is really your
zone name it could be a bug in the router.
Didier
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, didier wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Le jeudi 16 novembre 2006 à
ee, hf_zip_zero_value, tvb, offset, 2,
> FALSE);
> + offset += 2;
>proto_tree_add_item(zip_tree, hf_zip_zero_value, tvb, offset, 4,
> FALSE);
>offset += 4;
>proto_tree_add_item(zip_tree, hf_zip_zone_name, tvb, offset, 1,FALSE);
>
>
Hi,
idl2wrs.sh is a generated file.
Didier
Index: Makefile.am
===
--- Makefile.am (révision 19890)
+++ Makefile.am (copie de travail)
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
EXTRA_SCRIPTS = idl2wrs
idl2wrs: tools/idl2wrs.sh Makefile
- cp $(srcdir
seems to fail to do the same thing in the http dissector:
>
> if (check_col (pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL))
> col_set_str (pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL, "ABBRV");
>
> if (check_col (pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO))
> col_set_str (pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO, "Some
08-27-19853.pcap
frame 281
packet-image-png.c:line 274 g_assert(len<10);
tries to decode after png IEND tag or something like that.
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> maintain the gtk1 code we very likely will remove it in the not too far
> future.
Guess I can do it, I need gtk1, gtk2 is way too slow and all my changes
are for gtk1 so I will have a working gtk1 backport anyway.
I can't guarantee a daily update but a monthly one is doable. Could put
spee
From the error it looks like
a bug in png dissector (yesterday stuff).
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
rred to a plugin?
MPEG2? a plugin is fine for this one...
Didier
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
setup.
>From the code it doesn't seems to be a faulty call to free.
void except_free(void *ptr)
{
if (ptr)
get_dealloc()(ptr);
}
in epan/except.c
should fixed it.
Didier.
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://w
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
