Re: [Wireshark-dev] Status of GTK3 and Wireshark

2012-08-02 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)
Hi, I'd be glad to try things and test. Especially the RTP audio player is in my interests. I don't know what it actually looks like in GTK3, but note that it is already relatively broken in GTK2 too. (Screenshot attached, WinXP). Lars -Original Message- From:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New contributor

2012-05-21 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)
Hi Koosha, Here's my (admittedly much self-serving) suggestion: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4960 i don't know if it's trivial, but it's unrelated to the core Wireshark stuff and thus should be easy to fix without having to digg into all the details. Regards, Lars

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation tracking

2012-05-11 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)
Hi Tobi, I don't understand your concern. (but that may be due to my weird understanding of English) If those packets are part of the same stream, i.e. they are being identified as belonging to the same conversation (by whatever means, eg adress-port mapping etc.), then the whole point of

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding features in VOIP analysis

2012-04-10 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)
Hi, Don't waste your time on (1). This problem is technically solved. But it's a license issue. G.729 decoders are subject to licence fees. Therefore Wireshark (as an open source project) will never include G.729 playback. (Well, in the foreseable future that is) There are more or less legal

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Query

2012-03-01 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
... not that there would have been any examples of recent submissions with that problem of course! (And if there would have been, any similarity is purely coincidental!) ;-) Lars From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org

[Wireshark-dev] Bug 6844 - Universal Alcatel Protocol - Reloaded - Review for check-in requested

2012-02-15 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Hi, i've been maintaining an inhouse dissector for Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise's Universal Alcatel (UA) protocol and sub-protocols for many years now. To my regret, this protocol suite used to be classified and i didn't get the authorization for releasing it to the Wireshark tree as open source.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 6844 - Universal Alcatel Protocol - Reloaded - Review for check-in requested

2012-02-15 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
is above 10% or so? Done in r40930 Good! --- end snip --- Regards Anders -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** Sent: den 15 februari 2012 10:26 To: Developer support list

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Bug 6844 - Universal Alcatel Protocol - Reloaded - Review for check-in requested

2012-02-15 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
which allow you to filter, graph, and do other good stuff. RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** wrote: You're right, Anders, I'll note this for further improvement. Any chances the dissector gets admitted anyway? The protocol suite is rather large and dissects several hundreds of different fields

[Wireshark-dev] Win32 build from 1.6.3 source tarball: svnversion.h missing and not generated?

2011-11-02 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Hi, While trying to compile 1.6.3 from wireshark-1.6.3.tar.bz2 on Windows, compiler complains that i have svnversion.h missing. Forcing nmake -f Makefile.nmake svnversion.h gives... rm -f svnversion.h perl make-version.pl This is not a SVN build. Thus, svnversion.h is not

Re: [Wireshark-dev] ASN.1 dissector non-functional?

2011-08-09 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
are trying to decode, I have another look. Thanks, Graeme On 5 August 2011 10:00, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** lars.ru...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote: Hi, in Wireshark 1.6.1, i'm unable to Decode As ... ASN.1 It works in Ethereal 0.10.5 (yes, i know, that's old) for the same trace file. Anybody

[Wireshark-dev] ASN.1 dissector non-functional?

2011-08-05 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Hi, in Wireshark 1.6.1, i'm unable to Decode As ... ASN.1 It works in Ethereal 0.10.5 (yes, i know, that's old) for the same trace file. Anybody knows why and when the ASN1 dissector got dysfunctional? Am i missing some preference settings? Does anybody have an example of a functional ASN1

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Jitter calculation (Telephony-RTP Stream Analysis)

2011-04-06 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Hi, Oh my, it's been a long time since I have written that code and i didn't check the diffs that have been contributed since, but i'll give it a try... (Code uses real time units instead of RTP timestamp units but that doesn't matter for the argument) Saved values from previous packet:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Jitter calculation (Telephony-RTP Stream Analysis)

2011-04-06 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
) -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** Sent: mercredi 6 avril 2011 18:42 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Jitter calculation (Telephony-RTP Stream

Re: [Wireshark-dev] decoding multiple packets to a protocol

2010-12-17 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Hi, For RTP, there's a heuristic: Try Preferences/RTP/Try to decode RTP outside of conversations = yes. Regards, Lars From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Romel Khan Sent: vendredi 17 décembre 2010

Re: [Wireshark-dev] decoding multiple packets to a protocol

2010-12-17 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Damn, Jaap beat me again... From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter Sent: vendredi 17 décembre 2010 17:19 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] decoding

Re: [Wireshark-dev] SIP Registrations Module

2010-11-16 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Hello Danny, i'm working a lot with SIP traces, including registration issues. I don't have any urgent need for this but it could be helpful in some occasions. Do you plan to track the registration time (Expires) also? I.e. will your module be able to tell for any given time wether a given

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Voip Graph: Port numbers too faint?

2010-05-04 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
, 0x64ff}, {0, 0x25ff, 0x25ff, 0x25ff} /*{0, 0x7fff, 0x7fff, 0x7fff}*/ }; Regards Anders -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** Sent: den 3 maj

[Wireshark-dev] Voip Graph: Port numbers too faint?

2010-05-03 Thread RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
Hi folks, I really like the new pastel color tones of VoIP Graph, but honestly, the port numbers are barely visible now. (see attached png) Could they be made a little darker? Regards, Lars wireshark 1.3.4 (SVN Rev 32342 from /trunk) Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs