actually build 2.6.2, I build master ... but I have been
building it from before 2.6 was forked.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.w
ireShark runs on multi-core CPUs, it does not distribute the
important work, AFAIK, among separate cores.
In my experience, the things that improve Wireshark performance are:
1. Memory. 64GB or more.
2. Using SSDs or NVMe.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/tv/sharkfest/
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe
gt;>
>> with
>>
>> default:
>> fputc(*p, fh);
>>
>> I do not know the Wireshark code, so I am not submitting a patch. This,
>> however, should work because JSON supports UTF-8 (see again [1]).
>>
>> [1] From the JSON page on Wikip
of which serves the original purpose,
> using file scope, and one of which serves this new purpose, using pinfo->pool
> scope?
That might make it more obvious what is going on when reading the
code, so I think that
_dissector_with_data() it should
> work.
Yes. Once you have a large enough number of parameters to any function
anyway it becomes easier to pass in a pointer to a structure ...
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
__
?
You can pass in a void * pointer to a blob of data. Put the result in
that blob of data.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wire
t; I would like this supported please?
Do you have a capture with that tag in it? Can you send it along.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wire
,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 3:19 AM, Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:51:13PM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have an application where I want to change the specification of an
>> HF entry o
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:32:12AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Richard Sharpe
>> <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
&
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am seeing something weird with proto_tree_add_bits_item, although it
> could be my misunderstanding as well.
>
> Attached are two screen shots showing the dissected
to register a fixed array but modify the entries?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org
___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-d
e them? (It is not mandatory, just a
convention.)
Do the tools generate the SPEC file in the correct place?
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-de
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated to the latest master branch and now find that it is
> compulsory to use cmake.
>
> Unfortunately, and despite installing a bunch of qt5 packages so the
>
, as far as I can see.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsub
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am trying to build the latest master on RHEL7.2 and am getting this:
>
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libQt5Gui.so:
Hi folks,
I am trying to build the latest master on RHEL7.2 and am getting this:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libQt5Gui.so:
undefined reference to `hb_font_funcs_set_nominal_glyph_func'
Does anyone know what library I need?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹
't think this is going to be a big issue. If you are aware
> of the syntactic differences, you can write a 5.2 compatible dissector and
> run it on Wirebait 5.3.
I have no contribution to these issues. However, I think the name
'sharkbait' would be a catchier n
Who can help?
Gerald can, I believe.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wires
seek in epan/crypt/dot11decrypt.c
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshar
oud.com
> __________
>
> ___
> Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/list
*ssid or guchar *ssid above?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:
*quic_tree, guint offset, quic_info_data_t *quic_info, guint32 pkn){
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via
There is a section on
> TVBUFF_SUBSET but that doesn’t seem relevant.
>
> How do I get the block data into a TVB, preferably without having to copy
> it?
Do functions like tvb_new_subset* not work for you? Check existing dissectors.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
__
Hi folks,
Now that 2.5 appears to have branched, will changes in master
automatically be pulled into 2.5.next, or do I need to create review
requests for them via Gerritt?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操
Hi folks,
I notice that Gerritt wants to use a cherry-pick strategy for my
latest changes for bug 14455 here
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/26046
I am not sure how to proceed at this point? Do I cherry-pick the
change to master?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Graham Bloice
<graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 21 February 2018 at 15:24, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Graham Bloice
>> <graham.blo...@trihed
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Graham Bloice
<graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 20 February 2018 at 18:01, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have noticed over the last few days that Windows builds
festation?
Is it this one?
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/25956/
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.
Hi,
I have noticed over the last few days that Windows builds are failing
quite a lot even though the Linux builds are not.
Also, I cannot seem to find the reason for the build failures.
Is it something I am doing?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操
nsert BAR and BA in places, so it will probably
be better to conform to the spec. There is a relatively easy to do
that, I believe.
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Richard Sharpe
> <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Simon Barber vi
(but not HE block acks ...)
It is, of course, mixed in with a lot of other changes:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/25685
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Richard Sharpe
> <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> In handling 802.11ax
no just 'wlan.ba.blah-blah'.
Does anyone have an opinion on whether or not that is unreasonable?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Ar
ad it. You know there is an app on RHEL for taking a screen
shot, don't you? That way you don't have to worry about holding the
camera steady.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:07 AM, S. Jacobi <sjac...@mailueberfall.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:05:14 -0800
> Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:39 AM, S. Jacobi <sjac...@mailueberfall.de>
>> wrote:
>>
teful for
> any information on this.
As far as I am aware it is the kernel that is doing this. Also, I
believe that only Linux supports the any device.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:
code of wireshark for this part.
Well, the source code is all there in epan/dissectors/packet-smb.c and
packet-smb2.c etc.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wi
Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Regards
){
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
This appears to be because, although I have libgcrypt-devel installed,
configure is not finding what it wants.
Can we fix this? #ifdef that function as well?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操
stuff on the radiotap dissector that I need
to complete but that also can go in as updates.
I think I also have some DPP updates as well.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Hi folks,
If we decide to include the 802.11ax changes I guess the release notes
need to be updated.
How do I do that?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-
reshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14340
>
> On Windows 7 64 Bit it's the same problem.
> Does no one else notice this?
I think I have seen this under Linux as well with builds from Master
... not sure how far it goes back but I can easily test 2.0.1.
-
Hi Folks,
Does tshark use your Wireshark preferences as well?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wiresha
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 9:02 PM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The DPP spec requires the EAPOL Key MIC length to be the same as the
>> Nonce length.
>
>
is 24
bytes, not the 32 bytes I am seeing.
Perhaps the only thing I can do is to introduce a preference for EAPOL
that allows the user to specify a different Key MIC size.
Thoughts.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操
Hi Folks,
Will I get something I can install from the petri-dish builds and if
so, where can I get them?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev
> <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Please see https://code.wireshark.org/review
’ defined but not
> used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=] static const value_string
> vht_max_mpdu_in_amsdu[] = {
H, that should not have happened.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Dario Lombardo
> <dario.lombardo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Richard, and Merry Christmas to you!
>> Which version are you using? Git blame shows m
> my compilers.
Hmmm, strange.
I am using the latest master ... maybe my default compiler flags are
more strict ...
I am building on something that is like RHEL 7.2 with gcc 4.8.5 but it
just started happening ...
and it seems to occur when I pull in Alexis' recent changes.
--
Regards,
Ri
:471:32: note: 'num_ts' was declared here
guint8 num_blocks = 0, num_ts;
Is it fixed already?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am running into problems with this in my latest build:
>>
>> #if defined(_WIN32)
>>
ndif
I suspect that I should simply define both of those as size_t and get
rid of the Windows specific stuff.
Does any one else have an opinion?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing
;>
>> As Guy already explained you, Wireshark is not designed to modify
>> packets, only to interpret their content. So this is not the right tools for
>> your needs and that's probably why no one else replied to your previous
>> similar questions.
>>
>> Best
a:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
&
ent, can I list the bugs? And if I do, will gerrit
> update Bugzilla? I'm guessing not for all, so what the best way to handle
> this?
>
> Thanks and regards...Paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of
&g
ng when we reopen that one bug.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, the problem really seems to be that my dev environment fails to
>> find pcap_open so it cannot s
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Nov 11, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sure. The immediate problem though is that acinclude.m4 assumes that
>> checking for pcap_open is
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I notice that the latest libpcap git repo calls pcap_open_rpcap from
>> pcap_open_live ... but I d
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, the problem really seems to be that my dev environment fails to
>> find pcap_open so it cannot s
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Pascal Quantin
<pascal.quan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Le 11 nov. 2017 17:15, "Richard Sharpe" <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Pascal Quantin
> <pascal.quan...@gmail.com
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Pascal Quantin
<pascal.quan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> 2017-11-11 16:45 GMT+01:00 Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I am hearing from one user that they could no longer us
o work or if it works?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark
he
alias when someone types in the other form. Ie, if they enter
wlan.beacon it should list in brackets (wlan.fc.type_subtype == 0x19)
and vice versa.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev
/
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/o
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Stig Bjørlykke <s...@bjorlykke.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sharpe
> <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My changes have not touched packet-btmesh.c
>>
>> CC packet-btmes
ht answer, neither my master fails to compile.
Hmmm, strange ... I am having problems with forward declarations as well.
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sharpe
> <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My changes have not touched packet-btmesh.c
>&g
]
create_master_security_keys(rec);
^
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe:
e handling of filter expressions.
Can anyone think of another way of doing this?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https
anyone seen this?
Also, where is the key info assembled in the dissector? I have not yet
understood where in the code this is being done.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Hi folks,
I am seeing the Microsoft-XBOX OUI 00-50-F2 appear is "(Microsof)" in
some dissections, as shown in the attached.
I cannot find where this is coming from. Does anyone know?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂
Hi folks,
I know the question is a little vague, but I know that the SMB
dissector can use a Keytab. However, when tshark is running can it
also use the same Keytab?
Can preferences be specified on the tshark command line?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操
dividing the filter
expression into two fields.
Are there any good suggestions?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev
> <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> F
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Michael Mann via Wireshark-dev
<wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org&g
with this. One is dissector tables.
Another is to declare certain functions non-static and put the
definitions in header files. There might be others.
Are there any suggestions?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via
wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Adding pcap-ng pipe support to dumpcap
>
> On 08/29/2017 02:35 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Ed Beroset <bero...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/16/2017 01:27 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Ed Beroset <bero...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> On 06/16/2017 01:27 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Kvidera, Evan D <ekvider...@winona.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Wireshark Devs
Hi folks,
I have a change up for review that introduces a new type, FT_OUI.
It works. However, the big question is that it changes the current
practice from the OUI being an INT24 to being BYTES.
This breaks backward compatibility I imagine.
Is this a big issue?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何
ler doing the following?
> -Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Sent: Sat, Aug 19, 2017 11:29 am
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Making oui_base_custom availab
olved_from_encoded etc replaced with
get_manuf_name_if_known and a few other changes.
Does that seem reasonable to you?
There's a couple of other places in there where I am not sure what is
going on, but I can stumble through ...
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
; packet-ieee80211.h: that should be the place.
> Cheers,
> Dario.
>
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Richard Sharpe
> <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a need to deal with OUIs in a dissector I am writing and find
> that it is defined a
Hi folks,
I have a need to deal with OUIs in a dissector I am writing and find
that it is defined as static void in packet_ieee80211.c.
Should I simply remove static from that declaration, or should we
promote it to some other file to make it generally available?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以
ms.
That is, it is not clear to me how to unify them at the moment.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org
may need its own dissector table for vendor specific functionality too.
I would love to give this some thought, and may do, but the damn
IEEE802.11 2012 spec is 2600+ pages long!
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
S
code in packet-ieee80211.c
to separate dissectors.
Indeed, the whole 802.11 dissector could do with a good cleanup.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wi
and at the moment. Not a big deal.
Perhaps a more light-weight serialization like XDR would be appropriate ...
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-d
Hi folks,
Last time I made a change I created a new commit based on review
comments and then squashed the two commits, but that caused issues.
Is it better to simply submit the new commit or do I need to ensure I
keep the original change-id in the commit?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康
reshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
> _________
ny code as yet.
I guess I will have to do some more work on this soon when my new
802.11 sub-dissector project is done.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshar
b2, dns, etc, it works.
I wonder what the difference is ...
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Sent: Sat, Jul 1, 2017 2:31 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wir
as what I used in col_set_str.
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Graham Bloice
<graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 19 June 2017 at 19:40, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Richard Sharpe
>> <realrichardsha...@gma
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Graham Bloice
> <graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19 June 2017 at 15:02, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Graham Bloice
<graham.blo...@trihedral.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 19 June 2017 at 15:02, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Richard Sharpe
>> <realrichards
A quick search suggests that other people are seeing similar errors. I
definitely have access to the internet and am doing this from home.
Also, a wget from a different shell (cygwin) succeeds for that file.
Is there some tool I have failed to install that is needed?
--
Regards,
Richard
201 - 300 of 581 matches
Mail list logo