On Monday 06 November 2006 11:16 pm, Ulf Lamping wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do not confuse the bug that I may have introduced, and the
wireshark/glib bugs.
THERE ARE NO WIRESHARK BUGS THAT YOU'VE FIXED (beside some very
unimportant memory leaks)!!!
and some uninitialized
Hi,
Did you have a look at www.snort.org ? It may be what you are looking for.
Frederic Heem.
Alle 15:03, lunedì 30 ottobre 2006, Lars Ruoff ha scritto:
Hi list,
I wonder if Wireshark could be extended to provide real-time network
issue detection and if there was any interest
Alle 15:32, lunedì 30 ottobre 2006, Lars Ruoff ha scritto:
Hi,
frederic heem wrote:
Hi,
Did you have a look at www.snort.org ? It may be what you are looking
for.
I had a look at it (although a short one i admit).
Fine, at least you've had a look a it.
Actually, I'm looking
Alle 22:04, mercoledì 25 ottobre 2006, Guy Harris ha scritto:
frederic heem wrote:
* fix pcap_open_live timeout:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=469579aid=1576578grou
p_id=53067
Note that there are other platforms where the underlying packet capture
mechanism doesn't have
Alle 00:47, giovedì 26 ottobre 2006, Ulf Lamping ha scritto:
frederic heem wrote:
Hi,
D-Bus support has been adding to wireshark.
For those who are interested to know more about this feature, a
README.dbus has been written.
Any comments will be appreciated
Cheers,
Frederic Heem
Alle 10:53, giovedì 26 ottobre 2006, Guy Harris ha scritto:
frederic heem wrote:
Do you mean that on Solaris, when a read blocks and no packet arrives,
the read hangs forever ?
Yes.
What about using select() + read() instead ?
The purpose of the timer on Solaris is *NOT* to ensure
Hi,
D-Bus support has been adding to wireshark.
For those who are interested to know more about this feature, a README.dbus
has been written.
Any comments will be appreciated
Cheers,
Frederic Heem
__
--- NOTICE
