Ulf Lamping wrote:
> What are the reasons of the following changes in capture_loop.c:
I've backed those out, for the reasons noted; the right way to fix
null-pointer dereferences in routines not defined to accept null
pointers is not to add checks to those routines, it's to avoid passing
those
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:30:12PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> These places look bogus and should be reverted, unless there are good
> reasons that I don't see ...
You know the code much better than I do, so feel free to revert that
stuff! Basically the only thing I tried to make sure was that th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=19777
>
> User: jmayer
> Date: 2006/11/02 09:45 AM
>
> Log:
> Frederic Heem:
> Fix some memleaks and overflows.
>
> I haven't committed the changes that are not bug fixes.
>
> Directory: /trunk/
> Ch