On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:09:36PM +0200, Kovarththanan Rajaratnam wrote:
> > It's a trade off, the idea being that by keeping the entire list the list
> > does not have to be recreated at refiltering. With the new packet list the
> > cost of adding a packet is low.
>
> I think the point Joerg was
shark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 29668: /trunk//trunk/gtk/:
> new_packet_list.c /trunk/: file.c
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:15:25PM +, k...@wireshark.org wrote:
>
> From what I wrote earlier, it seems that the packet list is always updated,
> even if nothing changed
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] För Joerg Mayer
Skickat: den 2 september 2009 19:44
Till: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 29668: /trunk//trunk/gtk
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:15:25PM +, k...@wireshark.org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=29668
>
> User: krj
> Date: 2009/09/02 10:15 AM
>
> Log:
> Make sure that we select the last row if autoscroll is enabled. The
> scrolling is still very jumpy.
