the logical and is the very same in both revisions. But what makes this code
confusing is the use of prefs.capture_device in one place and then
prefs_p-capture_device in another. Maybe what you really want is
if ((global_capture_opts.num_selected == 0)
(prefs.capture_device != NULL)
On 21 January 2013 17:27, Dirk Jagdmann d...@cubic.org wrote:
the logical and is the very same in both revisions. But what makes this
code
confusing is the use of prefs.capture_device in one place and then
prefs_p-capture_device in another. Maybe what you really want is
if
On Jan 20, 2013, at 1:45 PM, j...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=47188
User: jake
Date: 2013/01/20 01:45 PM
Log:
Fix for CID 715142.
Be aware that the short-circuit evaluation only applies to the
first operand of a logical AND
Hi,
I think I have been staring at line 2895 too long. Since I didn't have Coverity
at my disposal this weekend I tried to take a stab at it, but couldn't verify
it. It looks like a strange construction anyway.
prefs_p = read_configuration_files (gdp_path, dp_path); is what makes it work,
but
