On 10/09/13 05:47, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi Gerald,
2013/10/8 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in
On 10/09/13 09:15, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi Guy,
2013/10/9 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
I think nowadays almost no one builds Wireshark for their own (apart
from Developers) and those who do can easily
install the tools for it.
Hmmm, I'm not so sure about that statement. I've seen (questions
On 10/10/13 9:45 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 10 October 2013 01:33, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org
For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
SDK in a central location on your system (I've been using c:\Qt) or in
WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR with everything else
wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Sent: Wed, Oct 9, 2013 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.11.0 release
For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
SDK in a central location on your system (I've been using c:\Qt) or in
WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR with everything else (which means
...@wireshark.org
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Sent: Wed, Oct 9, 2013 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] 1.11.0 release
For people doing development on Windows, would you rather have the Qt
SDK in a central location on yoursystem (I've been using c:\Qt
Hi Gerald,
2013/10/8 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in the
release packages:
Windows 32-bit:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
How about dropping the automake based and nmake based makefile systems and
replacing both with CMake?
So do you propose that people who are building from source only because they
don't have binary packages available for
On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Meaning we'll no longer be offering a development release that's older than the
current stable release?
(We should probably drop the development release
On 9 October 2013 11:21, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
2013/10/9 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
How about dropping the automake based and nmake based makefile systems
and
replacing both with CMake?
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Building Wireshark already needs way more tools than just make and a C
compiler.
Perhaps we should fix that, so that the release tarball includes all generated
source. I'd prefer not to require Flex, yacc/Bison, Perl,
Hi Guy,
2013/10/9 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Building Wireshark already needs way more tools than just make and a C
compiler.
Perhaps we should fix that, so that the release tarball includes all
generated source.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:15:41PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
According to our CMakeList.txt it will be:
...
project(Wireshark C CXX)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
set(CMAKE_BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY 2.6)
...
Unless you want to build with Qt5:
I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in the
release packages:
Windows 32-bit: GTK3 and Qt
Windows 64-bit: GTK2 and Qt
OS X 64-bit: Qt
OS X
13 matches
Mail list logo
