On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:56:53 -0700, Guy Harris wrote
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Didier wrote:
>
> > Is it ok if I upload the diff (~ 250 KB) in the wiki?
>
> From looking at the version you uploaded as an attachment to
>
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization
>
> it look
On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Didier wrote:
> Is it ok if I upload the diff (~ 250 KB) in the wiki?
From looking at the version you uploaded as an attachment to
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization
it looks as if one of the components is a new CList implementation.
Is tha
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:08:29 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
> >
> > When trying to attach a one line patch.
> Hmm, better follow the suggestion of Anders and post it on the Wiki.
Done at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization, currently only the
patch, writing some stuff about it.
Didier
Didier wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:20:36 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
>> Hi,
>>
>> One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability.
>> This proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific
>> hacks, contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a
> It's
e: Re: [Wireshark-dev] About a faster wireshark
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:20:36 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
> Hi,
>
> One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability.
> This proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific
> hacks, contradicting this p
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:20:36 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
> Hi,
>
> One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability.
> This proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific
> hacks, contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a
It's not, (ok there's four
Hi,
One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability. This
proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific hacks,
contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a seperate
patch, not included in trunk. What do you propose on maintenance of this
patch?
Hi
Some time ago I did work on a faster wireshark and it could be useful to others.
Is it ok if I upload the diff (~ 250 KB) in the wiki?
Notes:
- gtk1 and gtk2 but it's glibc and gcc only (easy to change).
- It was for running on G4 Macs ie a not registers starved CPU with rather
slow memory.
-
