On 29.08.2006, at 21:15, Thomas Steffen wrote:On 8/29/06, Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I installed Wireshark/Ethereal from Darwin Ports so it took care of thedependencies, then I laid out my source code to develop with. Exactly. If you don't like to mess with dependencies yourself, use
On 8/29/06, Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed Wireshark/Ethereal from Darwin Ports so it took care of the
> dependencies, then I laid out my source code to develop with.
Exactly. If you don't like to mess with dependencies yourself, use a
tool that covers them. The obvious ch
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:22:28AM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
> Once this has completed I'l put up another Installer for wireshark
> 0.99.3a for MacOS X so the MacOS X users don't have to go through
> building 21 packages and spend hours and hours.
I installed Wireshark/Ethereal from Darwin Por
If no one else wants to support gtk1 I can do that.
As long as no one actively tries to break gtk1 it shouldnt be too
difficult. Or at least ill try to keep it compileable and workable
until it is too much work and ill have to switch to gtk2.
I.e. leaving gtk1 as unsupported and only suppor
> I don't build with ADNS; I'll have to install it and see what happens.
apparently thats the issue there. that one doesnt want to build
unless you tell it to only build the static library.
> You didn't list GTK+ as one of the packages; presumably you're
> building it with one of the newer vers
On Aug 28, 2006, at 7:22 PM, Andreas Fink wrote:
> Now I'm on the last bit. Wireshark itself and I hit one error I
> can't figure out what I'm doing wrong:
>
> here's the last few lines of output from make:
>
> ...L/usr/local/lib /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.dylib /usr/lib/
> libc.dylib /usr/
I took another effort to build wireshark on MacOS X with gtk 2 instead of gtk.It took me 7 hours so far and I got all dependencies tracked down.There are still far too many but in comparison to last attempt, most dependencies now compile out of the box on MacOS X which was not the case when I tried
Andreas Fink wrote:
> This list just came as output from "fink show-deps ethereal" and the
> corresponding libraries.
So are we talking about the Fink project's Ethereal/Wireshark package,
or the Andreas Fink Ethereal/Wireshark package? :-)
If it's the Fink project's package, they might, for w
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:25:36AM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
> pcre I dont know even what it is. its for sure not needed on MacOS X.
You really should include it in the normal build: It will provide
improved display filters (regular expression lib).
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andreas FinkSent: den 28 augusti 2006 09:44To: Developer support list for WiresharkSubject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone of the developers going to support Win98(and alike) any further? Otherwise we should"officially" drop support of
On 28.08.2006, at 11:28, Guy Harris wrote:Andreas Fink wrote: To give you an example what you have to maintain for GTK2 on MacOS X.This is the list of dependent packages to link to for GTK2 under MacOS X ... libpcap libpcap-shlibs libjpeg libjpeg-shlibs libpng3 libpng3-shlibs
Andreas Fink wrote:
> To give you an example what you have to maintain for GTK2 on MacOS X.
> This is the list of dependent packages to link to for GTK2 under MacOS X
...
> libpcap
> libpcap-shlibs
> libjpeg
> libjpeg-shlibs
> libpng3
> libpng3-shlibs
> libtif
On 28.08.2006, at 10:13, Ulf Lamping wrote:Andreas Fink wrote: To give you an example what you have to maintain for GTK2 on MacOS X.This is the list of dependent packages to link to for GTK2 under MacOS X atk1 atk1-shlibs gettext-bin gettext-dev gettext-tools glib2 glib2-dev
Andreas Fink wrote:
> To give you an example what you have to maintain for GTK2 on MacOS X.
> This is the list of dependent packages to link to for GTK2 under MacOS X
>
> atk1
> atk1-shlibs
> gettext-bin
> gettext-dev
> gettext-tools
> glib2
> glib2-dev
> glib2-shli
ng to support Win98(and alike) any further? Otherwise we
should"officially" drop support of it!
To give you an example what you have to maintain for GTK2 on MacOS X.
This is the list of dependent packages to link to for GTK2 under MacOS
X
atk1
atk1-shlibs
gettext-bin
gettext-
To give you an example what you have to maintain for GTK2 on MacOS X.This is the list of dependent packages to link to for GTK2 under MacOS X atk1 atk1-shlibs gettext-bin gettext-dev gettext-tools glib2 glib2-dev glib2-shlibs gtk+2 gtk+2-dev gtk-doc libiconv
Well, I'm very much for dropping GTK-1 support:Look at the source in gtk/ to see the effort it takes to take all thedifferences between gtk1 and gtk2 into account as well as the effortto maintain both versions. Compare this with the one-time-effort toset up a working compile time env for gtk2 for
Hi,
Le dimanche 27 août 2006 à 13:38 +0200, Joerg Mayer a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
> > I have however to disagree on dropping support for GTK version 1.2. I
> > currently build wireshark on MacOS X wiht GTK 1.2 for a good reason.
> > The dependencies
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Andreas Fink wrote:
> I have however to disagree on dropping support for GTK version 1.2. I
> currently build wireshark on MacOS X wiht GTK 1.2 for a good reason.
> The dependencies of GTK is GLIB and nothing else. If you build it
> with GTK2, then you
On 26.08.2006, at 15:32, Erwin Rol wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 14:32 +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> Hi List!
>>
>> The current situation of Win98/95/ME (and Nt 4.0) support is
>> unsatisfactory IMHO.
>>
>
> I assume this is due to the request from Tor Lillqvist on the GTK list
> to drop support
Erwin Rol wrote:
> I assume this is due to the request from Tor Lillqvist on the GTK list
> to drop support for those platforms in upcoming GTK releases.
>
No, it's simply by the way that we know Win9x don't work with Wireshark
but we intend it could in the docs.
I just want to have a clear s
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 14:32 +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> The current situation of Win98/95/ME (and Nt 4.0) support is
> unsatisfactory IMHO.
>
I assume this is due to the request from Tor Lillqvist on the GTK list
to drop support for those platforms in upcoming GTK releases.
I am
Hi List!
The current situation of Win98/95/ME (and Nt 4.0) support is
unsatisfactory IMHO.
Telling our users "it may or may not work" isn't very nice if we really
now that it won't work and certainly will never work anymore in the future.
Our current Wireshark releases 0.99.2 / 0.99.3 won't wo
23 matches
Mail list logo
