Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
Why? There's already existing webservice which is offering what we need,
with existing community, why we should have our own?
The reason is better integration into the established wireshark services
(ask.wireshark.org and bugs.wireshark.org).
I really don't see the
== Guy Harris wrote:
I don't know whether pcapr.net accepts files that aren't in pcap (or
I mentioned pcapr just as an example. I think it would be better to
host that archive in the wireshark.org domain.
Presumably you mean what protocols are used, as pcapr doesn't take
that's what I
Hello Kurt,
The idea for having a CloudShark instance available to the Wireshark core
team originally surfaced at Sharkfest. We would be happy to provide this.
We'd also be happy to host it or it could live with other Wireshark
resources. Our virtual appliance can run under a VM or be installed
Joe McEachern wrote:
The idea for having a CloudShark instance available to the Wireshark core
team originally surfaced at Sharkfest. We would be happy to provide this.
Joe,
I just brought up the discussion, based on the mentioned question. I'm
glad to hear this has already been discussed
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Knochner
Sent: 01 August 2012 14:51
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Capture File Archive
Joe McEachern wrote:
The idea
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:51:29AM +0200, Kurt Knochner wrote:
== Guy Harris wrote:
I don't know whether pcapr.net accepts files that aren't in pcap (or
I mentioned pcapr just as an example. I think it would be better to
host that archive in the wireshark.org domain.
Why? There's
Using your own instance of CloudShark would provide more control than using
the existing cloudshark.org. We also have features in the appliance version
that are turned off on cloudshark.org. But using the existing
cloudshark.orgis also an option.
Cloudshark is not a test tool so its not going to
Hi,
in a QA question
(http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/9180/strip-off-gtp-headers), Chris
Maynard suggested to provide the caputre files that have been uploaded
to bugs.wireshark.org in a similar way as pcapr.net does.
I like the idea, as it sometimes can help to troubleshoot issues
On Jul 31, 2012, at 7:58 AM, ws.dev.l...@nospam.knochner.com wrote:
in a QA question
(http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/9180/strip-off-gtp-headers), Chris
Maynard suggested to provide the caputre files that have been uploaded to
bugs.wireshark.org in a similar way as pcapr.net does.
If
ws.dev.l...@nospam.knochner.com wrote:
Hi,
in a QA question
(http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/9180/strip-off-gtp-headers), Chris
Maynard suggested to provide the caputre files that have been uploaded
to bugs.wireshark.org in a similar way as pcapr.net does.
I like the idea, as it
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 04:58:19PM +0200, ws.dev.l...@nospam.knochner.com wrote:
in a QA question
(http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/9180/strip-off-gtp-headers), Chris
Maynard suggested to provide the caputre files that have been uploaded
to bugs.wireshark.org in a similar way as
11 matches
Mail list logo
