Re: [Wireshark-dev] Correct and efficient way of displaying bit fields?

2011-10-10 Thread Glenn Matthews
On Oct 7, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Kaul wrote: I'm struggling for some time now with displaying bitfields, I'm sure there must be something I'm overlooking, or it's just a bit difficult to do in Wireshark. I have a 32bit, little endian field, which I'd like to parse the bits (as set/not set):

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Correct and efficient way of displaying bit fields?

2011-10-08 Thread Helge Kruse
Am 07.10.2011 23:22, schrieb Kaul: I'm struggling for some time now with displaying bitfields, I'm sure there must be something I'm overlooking, or it's just a bit difficult to do in Wireshark. I have a 32bit, little endian field, which I'd like to parse the bits (as set/not set): Example: 05

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Correct and efficient way of displaying bit fields?

2011-10-08 Thread Guy Harris
On Oct 7, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Kaul wrote: I'm struggling for some time now with displaying bitfields, I'm sure there must be something I'm overlooking, or it's just a bit difficult to do in Wireshark. I have a 32bit, little endian field, which I'd like to parse the bits (as set/not set):

[Wireshark-dev] Correct and efficient way of displaying bit fields?

2011-10-07 Thread Kaul
I'm struggling for some time now with displaying bitfields, I'm sure there must be something I'm overlooking, or it's just a bit difficult to do in Wireshark. I have a 32bit, little endian field, which I'd like to parse the bits (as set/not set): Example: 05 00 00 00 1 0 0 0 Feature A - set