...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Michael Tuexen
Sent: den 17 februari 2012 16:54
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Meeting minutes from (pre)FOSDEM meeting
Hi Joerg,
first of all: Thank you very much for providing the notes.
Some
Hi Joerg,
first of all: Thank you very much for providing the notes.
Some comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
As some people met in Brussels on the eve of FOSDEM and talked about
Wireshark,
here are some notes on what was talked about. We
So: Do you think fixing the current Makefile.nmake to be able to do
out-of-
tree builds is worth any effort ?
I think I read the above to indicate no (or maybe: wait until
non-cygwin
name is complete and then fix that ?)
My personal feeling is that CMake is the way to go, and that the
Alexis La Goutte wrote:
Thanks, for the minute !
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de
mailto:jma...@loplof.de wrote:
[...]
i10n:
- for the GUI OK
- for the dissectors not OK
- if someone wants to do it: don't stop him or her
I work on this topic
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:35:06PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
On backporting, I did a lot of that stuff for 1.4.11. From my
experience, when the patch is clean the backport is easy.
Trouble is is that the patch comes from another trunk, which may have
other changes (like ENCodings) which
Thanks, for the minute !
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
[...]
i10n:
- for the GUI OK
- for the dissectors not OK
- if someone wants to do it: don't stop him or her
I work on this topic with qtshark.
I will send a patch soon with i10n support of
As some people met in Brussels on the eve of FOSDEM and talked about Wireshark,
here are some notes on what was talked about. We just don't want to leave anyone
out on what was talked about.
As usual: These are personal opinions etc, nothing is set in stone
ciao
Jörg
Next release:
-
Jörg:
Thanks for the detailed write-up.
Bill
(See below)
On 2/3/2012 10:51 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
qtshark:
- maybe we can attract a seasoned qt-developer to help us getting started
with the qtshark design stuff
+1
cmake:
- on windows
+ cmake would allow out-of-tree builds on
Hi all down there in Belgium,
I see I missed a lot already :/ Good to see so many things discussed.
Well done documenting this Jörg.
Without starting a complete discussion I would like to put in my 2
cents.
On backporting, I did a lot of that stuff for 1.4.11. From my
experience, when
cmake:
- on windows
+ cmake would allow out-of-tree builds on Windows
+ starting with a cygwin/nmake alternative would be an idea as there is
no native windows / VisualStudio setup available right now.
Meaning: out-of-tree using nmake ?
(If so, I coulkd take a shot
On 2/3/2012 11:50 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
cmake:
- on windows
+ cmake would allow out-of-tree builds on Windows
+ starting with a cygwin/nmake alternative would be an idea as there is
no native windows / VisualStudio setup available right now.
Meaning: out-of-tree using
Joerg Mayer wrote:
As some people met in Brussels on the eve of FOSDEM and talked about Wireshark,
here are some notes on what was talked about. We just don't want to leave anyone
out on what was talked about.
As usual: These are personal opinions etc, nothing is set in stone
[...]
12 matches
Mail list logo
