la part de Ulf Lamping
Envoyé : mercredi 20 décembre 2006 01:51
À : Developer support list for Wireshark
Objet : Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6 support isa
bitoutdated ...
Gerald Combs wrote:
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>> The biggest hurdle seems to be the different msvcrt.
RABRET Laurent RD-MAPS-ISS wrote:
> Of course there's one, I posted a patch about 1.5 years ago for the formerly
> Ethereal to successfully compiled with Visual > 6. I have always successfully
> used this patched Ethereal/Wireshark compiled with VS 2003 and have just
> checked when compiled with
RABRET Laurent RD-MAPS-ISS wrote:
> Of course there's one, I posted a patch about 1.5 years ago for the formerly
> Ethereal to successfully compiled with Visual > 6. I have always successfully
> used this patched Ethereal/Wireshark compiled with VS 2003 and have just
> checked when compiled with
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> RABRET Laurent RD-MAPS-ISS wrote:
-snip-
>>Caution: if you test, DO NOT FORGET to compile "zlib" to ensure RT lib
>>consistency.
>>
>
> I've just disabled ZLIB (avoiding compilation of it - for now) and
> GNUTLS (strange compiler error that I don't understand) in the
> co
ll: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Microsoft Visual C Version 6 support isa bitoutdated
...
<>___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Ulf Lamping wrote:
>>It wouldn't be this one by any chance? Quoting myself from December 05
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>In openssl.h I had to change the typedef for X509_NAME and all the
>>places it is used to something else because of some error I suspect (but
>>couldn't prove) is a name clash. X50
Andrew Hood wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/72c89ea76c253905/76f8cbdc64a6efd6?lnk=st&q=MSVC+%22X509_NAME%22&rnum=1#76f8cbdc64a6efd6
>
> and
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/e01d1192f0ff788e/985b19d72f482
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Andrew Hood wrote:
>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/72c89ea76c253905/76f8cbdc64a6efd6?lnk=st&q=MSVC+%22X509_NAME%22&rnum=1#76f8cbdc64a6efd6
>>
>>and
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/e01d
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Andrew Hood wrote:
>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/72c89ea76c253905/76f8cbdc64a6efd6?lnk=st&q=MSVC+%22X509_NAME%22&rnum=1#76f8cbdc64a6efd6
>>
>>and
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/e01d
Andrew Hood wrote:
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>> Thanks for pointing it out!
>>
>> As the threads suggest, this isn't a direct problem with the MSVC
>> version used, but if a Platform SDK is used or not.
>>
>
> wireshark SVN 20326 for gtk2 compiles with MSVC2005 (aka MSVC8,
> "Microsoft Visual
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Andrew Hood wrote:
>
>>Reading
>>gzipped pcap files does work.
>>
>
> That's the next I will look for - how to do this in a clean.way for all
> compiler variants.
The simplest solution would probably be to not download zlib123 but
instead to download the source zlib-1.2.3
Andrew Hood wrote:
>
> The simplest solution would probably be to not download zlib123 but
> instead to download the source zlib-1.2.3 and compile it. That way the
> same MSVCR* gets used throughout.
>
I've checked it in a change that MSVC 6 runs like before, while every
other version downloads
12 matches
Mail list logo
