Hi,
I see that this might be of interest and will proceed to complete the needed
testing and submit to review.
-Anders
Sendt fra min iPhone
> 27. des. 2019 kl. 10:22 skrev Alexis La Goutte :
>
>
> Hi Anders,
>
> It is always interressing to include new RFC on Wireshark
>
> Please push on
Hi Anders,
It is always interressing to include new RFC on Wireshark
Please push on upstream (you can look the wiki about help)
Cheers
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 9:52 PM Anders Reggestad
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have as part of a study of the RFC8364, written a dissection of the PFM
> message from
On Dec 25, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> If someone would find it useful then you should submit it.
And if it adds support for a protocol feature that's not currently supported,
somebody will probably find it useful.
> https://code.wireshark.org/review
And:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 12:52 PM Anders Reggestad
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have as part of a study of the RFC8364, written a dissection of the PFM
> message from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8364 as part of the Protocol
> Independed Multicast (PIM) dissection. Not sure if this is of interest to
Hi,
I have as part of a study of the RFC8364, written a dissection of the PFM
message from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8364 as part of the Protocol
Independed Multicast (PIM) dissection. Not sure if this is of interest to
include into the source base or not?
Regards,
Anders Reggestad
