Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-29 Thread Brian Vandenberg
I've written a bug up on this (bug #1132). I believe the culprit is a combination of the SSL dissector and the http dissector. -Brian Brian Vandenberg wrote: >> IIRC there's a call to col_set_writable(.., FALSE) >> somewhere in dissector-http.c >> >> > Thanks for the tip, I had figur

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-29 Thread Brian Vandenberg
> > IIRC there's a call to col_set_writable(.., FALSE) > somewhere in dissector-http.c > > Thanks for the tip, I had figured out that it wasn't writable, but I hadn't [yet] found where it was being set to not writable. I'm slowly narrowing in on this, so hopefully I'll know what's causing t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-28 Thread Brian Vandenberg
I've written a bug up on this (bug #1132). I believe the culprit is a combination of the SSL dissector and the http dissector. -Brian Brian Vandenberg wrote: >> IIRC there's a call to >> col_set_writable(.., FALSE) >> somewhere in dissector-http.c >> >> >> > Thanks for the tip, I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-28 Thread Brian Vandenberg
> > IIRC there's a call to > col_set_writable(.., FALSE) > somewhere in dissector-http.c > > Thanks for the tip, I had figured out that it wasn't writable, but I hadn't [yet] found where it was being set to not writable. I'm slowly narrowing in on this, so hopefully I'll know what's causi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-28 Thread Brian Vandenberg
Ulf, Certain of it. My protocol tree gets created and added below the http tree. In addition, if I remove my plugin from the plugins folder and run wireshark and open the pcap file I'm using for testing I see the exact same behavior: the http response packets still show up as TLSv1 packets

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-28 Thread didier
Hi, Le mercredi 27 septembre 2006 à 09:08 -0600, Brian Vandenberg a écrit : > I'm writing a dissector that relies on the http dissector. The > server's I'll be monitoring use ssl, so there's a requirement to use the > ssl dissector to decrypt the packets and hand them off to the http > dissec

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-27 Thread Ulf Lamping
Brian Vandenberg wrote: > I'm writing a dissector that relies on the http dissector. The > server's I'll be monitoring use ssl, so there's a requirement to use the > ssl dissector to decrypt the packets and hand them off to the http > dissector. > > Requests & responses are both treated pro

[Wireshark-dev] Possible bug with check_col?

2006-09-27 Thread Brian Vandenberg
I'm writing a dissector that relies on the http dissector. The server's I'll be monitoring use ssl, so there's a requirement to use the ssl dissector to decrypt the packets and hand them off to the http dissector. Requests & responses are both treated properly during dissection, so that i