Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removal of reedsolomon code

Good catch, thanks. Fixed in g7878878 On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > > 1bbe5cf by Evan Huus (eapache@...): > > Add correct license headers for reedsolomon code. > > I got in contact with the original author (thanks to Didier for digging > up his > current e

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removal of reedsolomon code

1bbe5cf by Evan Huus (eapache@... ): Add correct license headers for reedsolomon code. I got in contact with the original author (thanks to Didier for digging up his current email address) an

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removal of reedsolomon code

Ah, the email in the source file was dead so I gave up, but that looks like the same person, I will try contacting him. Thanks, Evan On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Didier wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:07:15 -0500, Evan Huus wrote >> As per my previous emails, the only questionably-li

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removal of reedsolomon code

Hi, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:07:15 -0500, Evan Huus wrote > As per my previous emails, the only questionably-licensed code we > have left is the reed-solomon implementation. It is used only in > packet-dcp-etsi.c. > > I have failed to find any other suitably-licensed reed-solomon > implementation

[Wireshark-dev] Removal of reedsolomon code

As per my previous emails, the only questionably-licensed code we have left is the reed-solomon implementation. It is used only in packet-dcp-etsi.c. I have failed to find any other suitably-licensed reed-solomon implementations, and don't have time to write one myself. As such I think our best co