Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removing ADNS

2016-03-19 Thread Pascal Quantin
Le 18 mars 2016 10:02 PM, "João Valverde" a écrit : > > I pushed a change removing ADNS support. If anyone depends on this: > > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/14519/ > By curiosity, is ADNS support an issue? ___ Sent v

[Wireshark-dev] Removing ADNS

2016-03-19 Thread João Valverde
I pushed a change removing ADNS support. If anyone depends on this: https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/14519/ ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscr

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removing ADNS

2016-03-18 Thread João Valverde
On 18-03-2016 23:00, Pascal Quantin wrote: Le 18 mars 2016 10:02 PM, "João Valverde" mailto:joao.valve...@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>> a écrit : > > I pushed a change removing ADNS support. If anyone depends on this: > > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/14519/ > By curiosity, is ADNS suppor

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removing ADNS

2015-05-01 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, If anything we could consider adding unbound(*) instead. Thanks, Jaap (*) Bug 4018 [PATCH] libunbound integration for async DNS resolution > On 01 May 2015, at 12:41, Joerg Mayer wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:16:00AM -08

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Removing ADNS

2015-05-01 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:16:00AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote: > Does anyone link Wireshark with GNU ADNS? If not I'd like to drop > support for it in master. The current version (1.5.0) switched licenses > from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ and prior versions don't support IPv6. IIRC c-ares has been the prefer

[Wireshark-dev] Removing ADNS

2015-03-02 Thread Gerald Combs
Does anyone link Wireshark with GNU ADNS? If not I'd like to drop support for it in master. The current version (1.5.0) switched licenses from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ and prior versions don't support IPv6. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-d