[Wireshark-dev] Should we disrupt our development model?

2011-08-30 Thread Gerald Combs
For a long time people have suggested that we migrate the Wireshark source code repository from Subversion to Git or Mercurial. Before deciding to move to one or the other (or even stay with Subversion) I'd like to get hear from the developer community about this. If you have an opinion about this

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should we disrupt our development model?

2011-08-31 Thread Andrei Emeltchenko
Hi, I was waiting this for a long time :-) Hopefully we can also use wireshark-dev for sending patches and development and redirect spam from buildbots to special mailing list ... Regards, Andrei On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Gerald Combs wrote: > For a long time people have suggested that w

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should we disrupt our development model?

2011-09-01 Thread Guy Harris
On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > I was waiting this for a long time :-) Hopefully we can also use > wireshark-dev for sending patches and development We've been doing that for years and years; changing the SCM software won't make a difference. > and redirect spam from

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should we disrupt our development model?

2011-09-01 Thread Andrei Emeltchenko
Hi, On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > >> I was waiting this for a long time :-) Hopefully we can also use >> wireshark-dev for sending patches and development > > We've been doing that for years and years; changing the