Re: [Wireshark-dev] Spurious TCP SEQ/ACK analysis errors

2010-11-03 Thread Graham Bloice
On 02/11/2010 18:08, Christopher Maynard wrote: Graham Bloice graham.blo...@... writes: Are folks seeing a lot of these on trunk? Almost every capture I load seems to have some TCP ACKed lost segment and TCP Previous segment lost warnings, even though the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Spurious TCP SEQ/ACK analysis errors

2010-11-02 Thread Christopher Maynard
Graham Bloice graham.blo...@... writes: Are folks seeing a lot of these on trunk?  Almost every capture I load seems to have some TCP ACKed lost segment and TCP Previous segment lost warnings, even though the sequence numbers are fine. Even more

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Spurious TCP SEQ/ACK analysis errors

2010-11-02 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 06:25:09PM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote: Even more oddly, the displayed warnings toggle on and off with every click of the reload button, along with the Seq value in the first packet (a SYN) changing from absolute to relative (in both the Info column and the packet

[Wireshark-dev] Spurious TCP SEQ/ACK analysis errors

2010-10-19 Thread Graham Bloice
Are folks seeing a lot of these on trunk? Almost every capture I load seems to have some TCP ACKed lost segment and TCP Previous segment lost warnings, even though the sequence numbers are fine. Even more oddly, the displayed warnings toggle on and off with every click of the reload button,