Hi.
After upgrading my local wireshark to latest trunk I get some warnings
from my preferences.
I suspect someone rewrote the preference format without handling /
converting old values?
The user should not loose the preferences when upgrading, just because
we changed the format.
12:33:02
The code won't look as clean, but I can add the backwards compatibility
functionality.
-Original Message-
From: Stig Bjørlykke
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 6:51 am
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when loading preferences
Hi.
After upgradi
: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when loading preferences
The code won't look as clean, but I can add the backwards compatibility
functionality.
-Original Message-
From: Stig Bjørlykke
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 6:51 am
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when lo
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Anders Broman
wrote:
> Is it worth it when you can just resave your preferences?
The user may have several profiles with different settings, and will
have to update all profiles with new settings again.
I think we should try preserving the preferences instead of gi
make the code look a little ugly, but is
certainly acheivable.
-Original Message-
From: Stig Bjørlykke
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 9:12 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when loading preferences
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Anders Bro
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Stig Bjørlykke
Sent: den 1 augusti 2012 15:06
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when loading preferences
On Wed, Aug 1
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, wrote:
> Technically the prefences aren't "obsolete", they are just renamed for
> (internally) optimized code.
We already handle a lot of renamed preferences in set_pref().
--
Stig Bjørlykke
__
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Anders Broman
wrote:
> And as a consequence we have a few of these cluttering up the code, should
> those live forever or
> Can the be removed after a suitable amount of time?
We should at least support one major upgrade :)
--
Stig Bjørlykke
___
would it make sense to add version sections to the preferences file?
Parsing the
preference file would a bit more work, but one could separate the
modified preferences
in a proper way from each other.
Extra benefit: One could use the same preference file with different
(older) versions of
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Kurt Knochner
wrote:
> would it make sense to add version sections to the preferences file? Parsing
> the
> preference file would a bit more work, but one could separate the modified
> preferences
> in a proper way from each other.
>
> Extra benefit: One could use t
This should be fixed in r44359
-Original Message-
From: Stig Bjørlykke
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 6:51 am
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when loading preferences
Hi.
After upgrading my local wireshark to latest trunk I get some warnings
from
; To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 6:51 am
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when loading preferences
>
> Hi.
>
> After upgrading my local wireshark to latest trunk I get some warnings
> from my preferences.
> I suspect someone rewrote
Fixed in r44370
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tuexen
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Wed, Aug 8, 2012 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Warnings when loading preferences
It seems that there is a problem with the new prefs and hiding columns
feature in the
n r44359
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stig Bjørlykke <
> s...@bjorlykke.org
> >
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark <
> wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> >
> > Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 6:51 am
> > Subject: [Wireshark-dev
14 matches
Mail list logo
