Re: [Wireshark-dev] Who did this to master?

2017-11-08 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sharpe > wrote: >> My changes have not touched packet-btmesh.c >> >> CC packet-btmesh.lo >> packet-btmesh.c: In function 'uat_btmesh_record_update_cb': >> packet-btmesh.c:939:9: error: implicit

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Who did this to master?

2017-11-08 Thread Stig Bjørlykke
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sharpe wrote: > My changes have not touched packet-btmesh.c > > CC packet-btmesh.lo > packet-btmesh.c: In function 'uat_btmesh_record_update_cb': > packet-btmesh.c:939:9: error: implicit declaration of function > 'create_master_security_keys' [-Werro

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Who did this to master?

2017-11-08 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Dario Lombardo wrote: > When you want to blame someone, the proper command is git blame. > However, running > > git blame epan/dissectors/packet-btmesh.c Yeah, I should have done that ... > I don't get a straight answer, neither my master fails to compile. Hmmm,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Who did this to master?

2017-11-08 Thread Dario Lombardo
When you want to blame someone, the proper command is git blame. However, running git blame epan/dissectors/packet-btmesh.c I don't get a straight answer, neither my master fails to compile. On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sharpe wrote: > My changes have not touched packet-btmesh.c >

[Wireshark-dev] Who did this to master?

2017-11-08 Thread Richard Sharpe
My changes have not touched packet-btmesh.c CC packet-btmesh.lo packet-btmesh.c: In function 'uat_btmesh_record_update_cb': packet-btmesh.c:939:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'create_master_security_keys' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] create_master_security_ke