Hi all,
I understand that different FOSS projects have different cultures,
norms, rules, etc. However, my experience with wireshark it has reached
a point where I think a post like this is requierd.
I don't want to see this as some kind of flame, or to claim that the
wireshark development model
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Harald Welte wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I understand that different FOSS projects have different cultures,
> norms, rules, etc. However, my experience with wireshark it has reached
> a point where I think a post like this is requierd.
>
> I don't want to see this as som
2012/8/19 Harald Welte
> Hi all,
>
> I understand that different FOSS projects have different cultures,
> norms, rules, etc. However, my experience with wireshark it has reached
> a point where I think a post like this is requierd.
>
> I don't want to see this as some kind of flame, or to claim
Hi Pascal,
> For me not all changes have the same potential of breakage: a change in an
> API used by an external tool can easily lead to a complete incompatibility
> (GSMTAP format unapproved changes for example) while a filter rename or a
> wrong subtree used to display a field (GMR-1 breakages
Pascal Quantin writes:
> 2012/8/19 Harald Welte
> I agree that this massive filter rename could / should have been discussed
before being done
The changes that Michael is making regarding filter renaming stems from
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2794. Anyone is welcome to
On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
> (http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-gsmtap.c?view=log
> for example) could be a way to easily monitor the changes done to a
> given file for whoever is inte
> From: lafo...@gnumonks.org
> 1) Is this the way how the wireshark development model / flow is
>supposed to work ?
Yes. The Wireshark model is that people submit patchs and then the Wireshark
core developers become the ongoing maintainers. This seems to have been
necessary for a long time
2012/8/19 Lori Jakab
> On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> > Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
> > (
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-gsmtap.c?view=log
> > for example) could be a way to easily monitor the changes done to
On 08/23/12 05:52, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> 2012/8/19 Lori Jakab mailto:l...@lispmob.org>>
>
> On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
> > Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
> >
>
> (http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-g
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Lori Jakab wrote:
> On 08/23/12 05:52, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>> 2012/8/19 Lori Jakab mailto:l...@lispmob.org>>
>>
>> On 08/19/12 06:56, Pascal Quantin wrote:
>> > Having a RSS link (or something similar) to the subversion file log
>> >
>>
>> (http:
10 matches
Mail list logo