Hi list,
I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=21066
and see what it looks like if I put, say, all the SS7 dissectors'
preferences in one preference tree called "SS7". The result was a
little sta
I agree!
On 3/26/07, Jeff Morriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066:
>
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=21066
>
> and see what it looks like if I put, say, all the SS7 dissectors'
> pre
I'll second that!
Olivier.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 16:05
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] preference tree for SS7
Hi list,
I finally had a chance to look a
>
> Hi list,
>
> I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066:
>
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=21066
>
> and see what it looks like if I put, say, all the SS7 dissectors'
> preferences in one preference tree called "SS7". The resul
l second that!
>
> Olivier.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 16:05
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] preference tree for SS7
>
>
On 3/26/07, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066:
> >
> > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=21066
> >
> > and see what it looks like if I put, say, all the SS7 dissectors
What about calling it SS7/SIGTRAN ?
Best regards
Michael
On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066:
>
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=21066
>
> and see what it looks lik
Luis Ontanon wrote:
> Now I have to type [Ctrl-Shift-P][p][r][o][RET][fw-arrow][t][c][TAB]
> and I can modify TCAP's
> prefs.
>
> Tomorrow I'll have to:
> [Ctrl-Shift-P][p][r][o][RET][fw-arrow][s][s][RET][fw-arrow][t][c][TAB]
> for a keyboard animal like me that's a loss...
>
> On the other han
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> So if we want to group protocols, we should group (at least) most protocols,
> to have the protocol list length dastically reduced.
True. This could be a first step, though. (I have to admit I was
amazed there were 21 protocols--and that's only those with
preferences--i
> -Original Message-
> What about having an option to "flatten the tree" to search
> all the protocols, sorted alphabetically, like today?
>
> Or even a "filter" box to search the list?
Or a group "All" which has all protocol preferences, some/all of which
can be accessed via groups t
+1 from me for the grouping.
I've been many many times looking for the right preference scrolling
through the long list.
Sometimes its not too obvious. Like M2PA versus MTP2. Or MTP3 versus
M3UA.
One thing I would love to have is a general setting for SS7 to say
how it should display poin
11 matches
Mail list logo
