prashanth joshi wrote:
> So length-2 bytes of data is added in to tree ,starting from the
> location number ofset + 5 of tvb.
> My query is : is it absolutely necessary to have hf_gtp_ext_
> as the second argument when ever we want to add an item?
> Can not we do away with it by having a NULL as
september 2006 09:25To: Developer support list for
WiresharkSubject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] query regarding gtp_handle funtionanddecoderfunction.Hi Anders, thanks. Now the things are much clearer. Now i understand why the return value from the decoder function is 3 + length. But yeah in va
en 6 september 2006 09:25To: Developer support list for WiresharkSubject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] query regarding gtp_handle funtionanddecoderfunction.Hi Anders, thanks. Now the things are much clearer. Now i understand why the return value from the decoder
function is 3 + length. But yeah i
".
Best
regards
Anders
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of prashanth
joshiSent: den 6 september 2006 09:25To: Developer support
list for WiresharkSubject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] query regarding
gtp_handle funtionanddecoderfunction.
Hi Anders, thanks.
Now the
