Hi,
I'm not sure because I don't have EtherCAT captures but
in plugins/ethercat/packet-ecatmb.c for example
- FT_UINT8, 16, NULL, 0x0, NULL, 0x000F, 0, 0, NULL, NULL }
+ FT_UINT8, 16, NULL, 0x0, NULL, HFILL }
Wasn't 0x000F in bitshift field a bug and the right patch something
Hey,
Good catch. I only noticed that setting the last 5 members would have no
effect so I simply replaced them with HFILL. This also looks suspicious:
- FT_UINT8, 16, NULL, 0x0, NULL, 0x000F, 0, 0, NULL, NULL }
+ FT_UINT8, 16, NULL, 0x0F, NULL, HFILL }
The base is specified as
