On 6 November 2012 20:26, Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:14:31PM +, Alex Bennee wrote:
We use a fairly simple ATM over Ethernet encapsulation for linking old
ATM based circuits with modern Ethernet based hardware.
Googling for 0x8884 I has
On 6 November 2012 10:13, Alex Bennée kernel-hac...@bennee.com wrote:
On 5 November 2012 18:53, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Nov 5, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Alex Bennee kernel-hac...@bennee.com wrote:
No, you need to implement a dissector for your ATM-over-Ethernet
encapsulation that
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Alex Bennée kernel-hac...@bennee.com wrote:
Ahh it makes more sense now. I've attached the re-worked patch which
adds an explicit atmoe dissector which seems to work.
Looks good.
I'd use tvb_reported_length() rather than tvb_length() when calculating the
number
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Alex Bennée kernel-hac...@bennee.comwrote:
On 6 November 2012 10:13, Alex Bennée kernel-hac...@bennee.com wrote:
On 5 November 2012 18:53, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Nov 5, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Alex Bennee kernel-hac...@bennee.com
wrote:
No, you
Evan Huus skrev 2012-11-06 19:48:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Alex Bennée kernel-hac...@bennee.com
mailto:kernel-hac...@bennee.com wrote:
On 6 November 2012 10:13, Alex Bennée kernel-hac...@bennee.com
mailto:kernel-hac...@bennee.com wrote:
On 5 November 2012 18:53, Guy Harris
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:14:31PM +, Alex Bennee wrote:
We use a fairly simple ATM over Ethernet encapsulation for linking old
ATM based circuits with modern Ethernet based hardware.
Googling for 0x8884 I has found that it's already defined as
ETH_P_ATMFATE (full name: Frame-based ATM
Hi,
We use a fairly simple ATM over Ethernet encapsulation for linking old
ATM based circuits with modern Ethernet based hardware. I was able to
enable the packet-atm.c to decde these frames very easily (see
attached) but I was looking for pointers for the next bit.
Currently I can't see a way
