I do not understand how jitter is exactly calculated. I have tried with theese
formula, but do not get the same results like Wireshark gets. Can anyone little
explain me about this.
If Si is the RTP timestamp from packet i, and Ri is the time of
arrival in RTP timestamp units for packet i, then
Thanks for everyone's comments so far. I am working on implementing the
suggestions.
I've started this thread over on the wireshark-dev mailing list for
those who want to follow along. It starts here:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200702/msg00648.html
Steve
_
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 09:24:45PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
> Sake Blok wrote:
> >
> > Would't this be option be feeling more at home under the "File" menu?
> > It is about exporting parts of the data-stream. My suggestion would be:
> > "File | Export | Objects".
>
> Yes, you're right, File is
Sake Blok wrote:
>
> Would't this be option be feeling more at home under the "File" menu?
> It is about exporting parts of the data-stream. My suggestion would be:
> "File | Export | Objects".
>
Yes, you're right, File is the place to go. "File / Export / HTTP
Objects" might be ok.
Do we wan
Hi,
Your listening to voicecalls via the analyze|VoIP calls menu item. Saving
(combined) audio files is done via the analyze|RTP menu item. Oke, it's
lame and we'll see these features merge in time, but for now this is the
way to do it.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Oliver Voelker wrote:
> H
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:06:44AM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
> Stephen Fisher wrote:
>
> > and give feedback on the implementation and if they can think of a
> > better top-level menu to put it under (View perhaps?).
>
> Basically, the View menu is about *how* things are displayed, and not
Here my meta-comments:
On 2/21/07, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Fisher wrote:
> Some things I've noticed:
>
> - this announcement should have gone to the developer list first (most
> developer related discussion will go to the users list now)
> - the buttons don't have a toolti
Stephen Fisher wrote:
> I have committed an initial version of a content listing/saving feature
> for the HTTP protocol.
First of all, thanks for this - it's a feature long awaited IMO.
> I would appreciate if anyone could try it out
> and give feedback on the implementation and if they can thi
