Re: [Wireshark-users] tShark SSL Decryption Issue

2008-03-04 Thread Sake Blok
Hi Al, There are a few common reasons for Wireshark not being able to decrypt ssl traffic. First of all, Wireshark might not be able to read the key (either it's not there or it's in the wrong format or it might be protected with a passphrase). In your logfile you have the message ssl_init

[Wireshark-users] Wireshark only capturing TCP handshake

2008-03-04 Thread John Temples
I'm trying to capture some incoming HTTP connections with Wireshark 0.99.8 on a Windows Server 2003 system. The only thing Wireshark captures is the three packets in the three-way handshake of the TCP connection; no other packets related to the connection are captured. However, the connection

[Wireshark-users] update packet-http.c

2008-03-04 Thread ms-design
Greetings! Explain, please: I change a file packet-http.c, then I start make from the catalogue.../wireshark/make, but result I do not see. packet-http.c Works on old, why??? How to update the objective module Thankful in advance! Alexey Metelkin ms-design

[Wireshark-users] headers HTTP

2008-03-04 Thread ms-design
Greetings! To me it is not clear, why in tvb in function dissect_http always there is object HTTP where it is located general_header and response_header??? As well as whence I can save in a file general_header and response_header (all fields) package HTTP Also how it is possible to save 1

Re: [Wireshark-users] tShark SSL Decryption Issue

2008-03-04 Thread Al Aghili
Sake, Thank you very much. I'll pursue the third reason and see if that makes a difference. Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:46 AM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re:

Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark only capturing TCP handshake

2008-03-04 Thread John Temples
The firewall is a dedicated appliance. It is not software running on the Windows 2003 system. On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Jaap Keuter wrote: Hi, Let me ask you: The firewall is on the troubled platform? And this firewall has rules for incoming non-local connections? Bet your firewall is

Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark only capturing TCP handshake

2008-03-04 Thread Gianluca Varenni
If it's not a firewall problem (e.g. because the firewall is a specific piece of hardware on the LAN, and not a software product), another possibility is TCP chimney, i.e. your network card performs TCP offloading. In this case the card is responsible for dealing with the TCP sessions almost

Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark only capturing TCP handshake

2008-03-04 Thread Robert D. Scott
Is the server multi-homed? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Temples Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 4:27 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark only capturing TCP handshake The

Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark only capturing TCP handshake

2008-03-04 Thread John Temples
It has multiple NICs, but only one is connected to the LAN. On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Robert D. Scott wrote: Is the server multi-homed? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Temples Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 4:27 PM To:

Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark only capturing TCP handshake

2008-03-04 Thread John Temples
As far as I can tell, it doesn't have a TCP offload engine. If it did, would I see different behavior depending on whether the connection originated locally vs. remotely? On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Gianluca Varenni wrote: If it's not a firewall problem (e.g. because the firewall is a specific piece

Re: [Wireshark-users] wimax question

2008-03-04 Thread Dan Wentzel
I have seen wimax dissectors in the code, but don't have access to a wimax link to verify how well (or if) they work. Bottom line: try it and see? bits On Mar 4, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Joao Matos wrote: Hi to all. First of all sorry if this is not the correct contact to ask this question,