> Is witango on Apples WWDC next week?
Yes
> Will they show 5.5?
Yes
Anyone going to WWDC should drop by.
Phil
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Go to http://www.witango.com/developer/maillist.taf
There is no performance penalties when using local compared to request.
> From: "Alan Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 24 June 2004 2:42:16 AM
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Tango to Witango conversion
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> just to make sure, from a preforman
Title: Message
So it works like I
thought...robots see include files as part of the page. Since these are
straight html, the robots shouldn't have any problems spidering through the
links. I'll tell 'em again.
Thanks very much
everybody!
-Original Message-From: Roland Dum
Title: Message
That's part of what
I'm trying to move to slowly...
/root
/includes
/tcfs
/images
/scripts
I didn't know you
could make them all read-only, though. I'll do that.
-Original Message-From: Robert Shubert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2
Title: Re: Witango-Talk: [OT] SEO & include
files
That's true. Sorry I misunderstood you.
no disagreement.
the bots don't find the include files,
but they will see whatever the include has to offer as a seamless part
of the rendered page. Therefore, if your include has logic in it, the
bot will
Title: [OT] SEO & include files
This
really an option on the server… best practice:
/ (root) contains HMTL and TAFs
/include contains included html/tml
/TCF contains TCFs
The web server should be programmed to not
allow read to the /include and /TCF folders. This won’t stop Wita
no disagreement.
the bots don't find the include files, but they will see whatever the include has to offer as a seamless part of the rendered page. Therefore, if your include has logic in it, the bot will see the product of that logic as part of the page that references the include.
so if my in
Title: Re: Witango-Talk: [OT] SEO & include
files
Sorry to disagree, but since the files are processed on the
server side, the bots don't even know they are includes and they read
them just fine.
Case in point...
If you view source of a taf with an include, what you see is what
the bot sees. T
1. you should protect your /includes/ folder to keep someone from guessing file names and reading them. There's usually nothing to hide, but it's a good practice incase your includes have some logic that you don't want to expose.
2. the includes are processed on the server side, replacing the @inc
Anything that the web server sends to the user agent is available.
But what is done with the info is up to the user agent. For example, you
can disable JavaScript or images in your browser, and of couse some info
will not be visible to you.
Likewise, it depends on the search engine as to how t
It depends on the complexity of the Access setup. The Upsize Wizard
does a pretty good job on tables/fields, but not always perfect.
If they have any code (macros, modules, field/form specific checks,
calculations, etc.) it will be lost. On the other hand, a lot of that
could probably be done
Title: [OT] SEO & include files
If I'm using INCLUDES (witango & asp) for link menus, etc., in my applications - do the search engine robots see those? I've thought that they do but a question came up, so I want to be sure before I give out wrong answers.
Thanks for any info! jamileh
We are running Witango Server 5.0.1.65 on a windows 2000 server. Lately
we've been having some problems with our ntbackup routine, either bad
tape blocks or full media. But what is more disturbing is that the
witango server seems to hang when this ntbackup error occurs, and the
server must be reb
Hi Dan,
Converting an Access database to SQL Server is the easy part (can't speak
for MySQL :-P).
The time consuming part will be the ASP code.
Obviously the database connection strings will be different, then the ADO
Recordsets in ASP. Their behavior may change with the upgrade.
Some SQL sta
I don't think that anyone has answered the real question yet. I think
that the question is how much ASP reprogramming would be needed?
There's not that much for Witango. I don't know ASP, so I can't
answer the question.
Stefan
At 11:41 AM 6/24/2004, you wrote:
Move the SQL 2000 shouldn't kill anyon
Move the SQL 2000 shouldn't kill anyone. It would be a conversion/import
of the DB, a huge find & replace task, then a decent test phase.
In perspective, I could transfer a large Witango site in about a day,
unless there were a large number of "Access workarounds" which needed to
be rewritten in S
I don't know about Access, but the FMP databases that I started with
looked like something simple to move to mysql, but on closer
inspection, I'd used a lot of FMP-specific functionality. Calculated
fields, portals, etc. It ended up being easier to start from scratch in
mysql and have all the l
Hi
In Access, there is a upsizing wizard to migrate to SQL Server. I have
never used it but you may get your answer there.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Dan Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Witango-Talk: [Off] Access t
I am looking for a confirmation of something to check on the skill level of
a company I may be working with.
They have a content management tool built in Access. It uses ASP. We want
them to migrate it to SQL 2000 or MySQL.
My understanding was that if the table structures were the same this woul
You don't have to close off an IF Action with anything else. It's pretty much worked that way since Tango 1.0.
Hope this helps,
Steve Smith
Oakbridge Information Solutions
Office: (519) 624-4388
GTA:(416) 606-3885
Fax:(519) 624-3353
Cell: (416) 606-3885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:
20 matches
Mail list logo
