27;s going on inside of it.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Conlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:48 PM
To: witango-talk@witango.com
Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: TCF defect?
Ahh. Will this let me break out of FOR/WHILE metatag loop? (as opposed
to action).
Ahh. Will this let me break out of FOR/WHILE metatag loop? (as opposed
to action).
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 10:06 AM, Bill Conlon wrote:
Manual states:
"This tag does not affect loops initiated with For Loop or While Loop
actions. "
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 09:14 AM, Bill
Manual states:
"This tag does not affect loops initiated with For Loop or While Loop
actions. "
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 09:14 AM, Bill Downall wrote:
Bill Conlon wrote:
I want to use a FOR action in a TCF. [I need an action rather than a
metatag so I can BREAK out of a loop on a co
Bill Conlon wrote:
I want to use a FOR action in a TCF. [I need an action rather than a
metatag so I can BREAK out of a loop on a condition.]
Bill,
There is also the <@BREAK> metatag for breaking out of a metatag
Bill
TO UNS
thx. Just came to the same conclusion.
On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 09:20 AM, John McGowan wrote:
It's a defect in the For action...
Absolutely... the counter variable should be a Method Scope, not a
Request Scope. Good Luckwriting a recursive TCF method with the For
Loop Action... )
I
It's a defect in the For action...
Absolutely... the counter variable should be a Method Scope, not a
Request Scope. Good Luckwriting a recursive TCF method with the For
Loop Action... )
I've found that if I want safe Methods that have loops in them I use the
While action instead, and unfortun
I want to use a FOR action in a TCF. [I need an action rather than a
metatag so I can BREAK out of a loop on a condition.]
Anyway, the FOR action uses a request scope loop counter, but it seems
to me that the loop counter MUST be in method scope in order for this
TCF to not risk clobbering an
