Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-22 Thread Rob Mensching
- From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:28 PM To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance? This is very much likely the issue. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:33 PM, jjbean

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-21 Thread Dan Puza
=105970atid=642714 -Original Message- From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:28 PM To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance? This is very much likely the issue

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-20 Thread Dan Puza
3.6.1908.0 -Original Message- From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 7:43 PM To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance? What version of Burn? On Tue, Jul 19

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-20 Thread Dan Puza
for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance? 3.6.1908.0 -Original Message- From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 7:43 PM To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-20 Thread jjbean
You have digitally signed binaries and cab files? Perhaps the caching mechanism is trying to perform SCVP/OCSP? Each signed file results a network timeout, which has a long default. SCVP/OCSP is retried before failure is accepted as the result? -- View this message in context:

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-20 Thread Rob Mensching
This is very much likely the issue. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:33 PM, jjbean jonks2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: You have digitally signed binaries and cab files? Perhaps the caching mechanism is trying to perform SCVP/OCSP? Each signed file results a network timeout, which has a long default.

[WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-19 Thread Dan Puza
Should there be any reason for the much slower times between these two log files for caching payloads? For example, Total time caching payloads: 8 minutes (slower) vs. 21 seconds (normal) Caching 2KB .REG file: 1 minute 18 seconds (10:24:32 - 10:25:50) Caching 1MB EXE file: 1 minute (10:25:50 -

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-19 Thread jjbean
Have you run process explorer to monitor what is going on while they are being cached? Perhaps something else is accessing the files (i.e. AV software?) -- View this message in context:

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-19 Thread Dan Puza
!RtlDosSearchPath_Ustr ole32.dll!CoGetTreatAsClass -Original Message- From: jjbean [mailto:jonks2...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 2:41 PM To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance? Have you run process explorer to monitor

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-19 Thread JohnG
That sounds familiar. A couple of years back we had a .NET app that would take a minute or two to start up without an internet connection. With a connection it took just a few seconds. If I remember right it was .NET 3.0. -- View this message in context:

Re: [WiX-users] Caching payload, sudden terrible performance?

2011-07-19 Thread Rob Mensching
What version of Burn? On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM, JohnG john.gonza...@intel.com wrote: That sounds familiar. A couple of years back we had a .NET app that would take a minute or two to start up without an internet connection. With a connection it took just a few seconds. If I remember