On 09/02/2013 12:13 AM, SJS wrote:
> I'd argue that this is not an _industry_ standard, only a _Microsoft_
> standard. And if I wanted the Microsoft UX, I'd use Microsoft Windows,
> thankyouverymuch.
>
If i am not completely mistaken, this precedes MS Windows. I do not
really bother using Windows
begin quoting Paul Seelig as of Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 01:54:42PM +0200:
[chop]
> And while we are at it, there are some more feature enhancements which
> would be very worthwhile to be added, but which strangely enough nobody
> ever seems to have bothered about yet:
>
> - Enable copy'n'paste via i
On 09/01/2013 08:22 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> I don't think that "other window managers do" is a reason to include
> code doing exoteric stuff and used once or twice in a lifetime
>
I guess it is a matter of perspective. Sometimes less is not more, even
if it might appear so when having a first
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:56:40 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > >
> > > > When was the last time you w
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> >
> > > When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager?
> > >
> >
> > Speaking of me: did i
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> > When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager?
> >
>
> Speaking of me: did it every time I was interested in a window manager
> development enough t
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager?
>
Speaking of me: did it every time I was interested in a window manager
development enough to run a bleeding edge version of it, to compare
behaviours when anything went
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 13:54:42 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 11:32 AM, Iain Patterson wrote:
> > Quoth I,
> >
> >> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
> >> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
> >> window managers (or ano
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:54 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> The other thing is that WINGs theming is severely limited, if not even
> simply broken when trying to integrate it with applications using other
> widget sets like gtk+ and qt. The latter can both be tricked to take on
> that NeXTish look (whi
On 08/29/2013 11:32 AM, Iain Patterson wrote:
> Quoth I,
>
>> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
>> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
>> window managers (or another wmaker) to replace wmaker in the same way.
>
>From a user's point
10 matches
Mail list logo
