On 08/16/2011 07:09, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> I.e. let's keep the upstream sources (if wmaker-crm can be called like that)
> distro agnostic.
... or better yet, truly portable code? :) There are still a LOT of
windowmaker users in bsd-land.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but no
On 08/16/2011 07:09, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> I.e. let's keep the upstream sources (if wmaker-crm can be called like that)
> distro agnostic.
... or better yet, truly portable code? There are still a LOT of
windowmaker users in bsd-land.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but noth
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 16:58:59 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Please, apply the patches :-)
I did, but rebased them too. Take a look at the result.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
On 08/16/2011 04:44 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
On 08/16/2011 04:21 PM, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
On 16.08.2011 15:44, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
[snip]
IMO we should move the files to the doc folder. (You? Me?, perhaps you
;-P).
I think it is desirable for kix to move as many files/changes
On 08/16/2011 04:21 PM, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
On 16.08.2011 15:44, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
[snip]
IMO we should move the files to the doc folder. (You? Me?, perhaps you
;-P).
I think it is desirable for kix to move as many files/changes into the
"official" repository as possible. The mor
On 16.08.2011 15:44, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
[snip]
IMO we should move the files to the doc folder. (You? Me?, perhaps you
;-P).
I think it is desirable for kix to move as many files/changes into the
"official" repository as possible. The more things in upstream are the
less Debian patches
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 15:44:31 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> >
> >Thanks, but these manpages should be inside the main doc/ folder
> >(i.e. they should not be debian-only)
>
> Ok,
>
> we can move all the manpages in debian/manpages to doc,
The idea is that anything which can be useful to
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:30:34 +0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 15:21:14 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
* New manpages
debian/manpages/wdread.1
debian/manpages/wmgenmenu.1
debian/manpages/wmmenugen.1
Thanks, but these manpages should be inside the main doc/
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:33:03 -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:26:45AM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
2. Many files are architecture independent, like images. We get a
lintian error about many files in /usr/ and probably the best is
move them to an architecture independent
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:26:45AM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> 2. Many files are architecture independent, like images. We get a
> lintian error about many files in /usr/ and probably the best is
> move them to an architecture independent "wmaker-" package. The
> package wmaker-data c
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 15:21:14 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> * New manpages
> debian/manpages/wdread.1
> debian/manpages/wmgenmenu.1
> debian/manpages/wmmenugen.1
Thanks, but these manpages should be inside the main doc/ folder
(i.e. they should not be debian-only)
--
To
* New manpages
debian/manpages/wdread.1
debian/manpages/wmgenmenu.1
debian/manpages/wmmenugen.1
This patch do not solve the problem about the manpages (lintian),
because there is an error in the wmaker.manpages file (next patch)
regards.
kix
0001-New-manpages.patch.gz
Descr
New upstream versin (0.94)
debian/patches are now DEP-3
debian/copyright is now DEP-5
regards
0002-New-upstream-version-now-from-git-debian-patches-are.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On 08/16/2011 11:54 AM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 11:26:45 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
4. I included a patch for a Russian wmaker manpage with an error (lintian)
The patch does not apply and it seems to be broken (I can't read it...not
that I understand russian, but t
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 at 11:26:45 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> 4. I included a patch for a Russian wmaker manpage with an error (lintian)
The patch does not apply and it seems to be broken (I can't read it...not
that I understand russian, but the encoding seems screwed up).
Your email has
Hi,
I try to update the debian folder. I have many many many patches :-( I
will try to sort them and then sent to this list.
I have some questions too, the most important:
1. There is a package in debian called wmaker-data, with icons. Should
we move these icons to the upstream version? Is t
Hi Guido, Francois, Jeff,
I am trying to update the wmaker/debian folder with the new wmaker-crm
0.94. Your applications (fsviewer and wterm) needs WMaker.h and other
libraries included in the libwmaker0-dev package. These files were
removed from the git source, therefore the package libwmaker
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 at 16:34:53 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> wmaker-crm has chosen to ship libWUtils and libWINGs as shared
> libraries, move these from the wmaker package to dedicated library
> packages.
>
> Andreas Metzler (2):
> Ship libWUtils and libWINGs in dedicated packages
> invoke
wmaker-crm has chosen to ship libWUtils and libWINGs as shared
libraries, move these from the wmaker package to dedicated library
packages.
Andreas Metzler (2):
Ship libWUtils and libWINGs in dedicated packages
invoke dh_installdeb after dh_makeshlibs
debian/control | 34 +
19 matches
Mail list logo
