On Thu, August 18, 2011, Martin Dietze wrote:
> That was mostly general stuff. If there's a long list of patches
> for a distro we should ask ourselves why they are for a distro
> only. Some distro-specific stuff might even be a good idea to
> adopt for the whole upstream. And the rest should be k
On Wed, August 17, 2011, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> At first I thought that the debian/ folder was something to support
> the automated builds created by Martin, but now it appears that your
> patches are doing what debian would do in their distro, and nobody
> but debian should worry about that.
>
Hello,
2011/8/17 Carlos R. Mafra :
>
> At first I thought that the debian/ folder was something to support
> the automated builds created by Martin, but now it appears that your
> patches are doing what debian would do in their distro, and nobody
> but debian should worry about that.
>
+1 on Dist
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:36:17 +0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 at 14:59:41 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
this is the debian patches pack :-)
At first I thought that the debian/ folder was something to support
the automated builds created by Martin, but now it appears that
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 at 14:59:41 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> this is the debian patches pack :-)
At first I thought that the debian/ folder was something to support
the automated builds created by Martin, but now it appears that your
patches are doing what debian would do in
Hi,
this is the debian patches pack :-) I spent some time yesterday night.
The aim is move debian/rules (and therefore many files) to the Standard
3.9.2 version.
I try to make independent patches for this reason we have many. The aim
is the last patch, but I cut the process in steps