On Monday 2015-06-22 10:02:56 Doug Torrance wrote:
> On 06/21/2015 03:37 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > I have just looked at the code and I think it could be done.
> >
> > This is what I did and it works fine. I have used 10px but it might
> > be increased (lower than 10px wouldn't look good).
> >
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 at 10:02:56 -0500, Doug Torrance wrote:
> On 06/21/2015 03:37 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
>
> > I have just looked at the code and I think it could be done.
> >
> > This is what I did and it works fine. I have used 10px but it might
> > be increased (lower than 10px wouldn't look
On 06/21/2015 03:37 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> I have just looked at the code and I think it could be done.
>
> This is what I did and it works fine. I have used 10px but it might
> be increased (lower than 10px wouldn't look good).
>
> It makes corner snapping much easier and it looks more like
Quoting message written on Sunday 2015-06-21 09:39:18:
> I didn't thoroughly look at the code so I'll just ask...
> In case when workspace linking is turned off, is it possible to
> make a bit borders/area in which window would snap into a corner
> without changing some other Windowmaker code?
>
>
Quoting message written on Saturday 2015-06-20 22:49:51:
> On 06/20/2015 05:11 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > I have just applied the patch and tested it and something is not
> > right.
> >
> > Without workspace linking the feature is still working as usual.
> >
> > With workspace linking enabled
On 06/20/2015 05:11 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
I have just applied the patch and tested it and something is not right.
Without workspace linking the feature is still working as usual.
With workspace linking enabled I get the window frame created UP/DOWN,
depending on the window position but if I
On 06/20/2015 05:11 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
I have just applied the patch and tested it and something is not right.
Without workspace linking the feature is still working as usual.
With workspace linking enabled I get the window frame created UP/DOWN,
depending on the window position but if I
Quoting message written on Saturday 2015-06-20 12:35:33:
> On 06/20/2015 03:41 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > Doug, would it be to hard to not completely disable the feature in
> > case
> > DontLinkWorkspaces is set to "NO" but to disable just the left/right
> > and corner snapping instead?
> >
> >
Quoting message written on Saturday 2015-06-20 12:35:33:
> On 06/20/2015 03:41 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > Doug, would it be to hard to not completely disable the feature in
> > case
> > DontLinkWorkspaces is set to "NO" but to disable just the left/right
> > and corner snapping instead?
> >
> >
On 06/20/2015 03:41 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
Doug, would it be to hard to not completely disable the feature in case
DontLinkWorkspaces is set to "NO" but to disable just the left/right and
corner snapping instead?
That way someone who is using workspace linking feature could still snap
a wind
Quoting message written on Monday 2014-09-22 14:29:36:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Great Feature !
>
> Just one comment which I think that it can be improved:
>
> Apparently right now it just does windo snapping in the right/left
> sides. It would be great if top/bottom maximization could be done too.
> In
On 09/22/2014 12:29 PM, Haroldo Gambini Santos wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Great Feature !
>
> Just one comment which I think that it can be improved:
>
> Apparently right now it just does windo snapping in the right/left
> sides. It would be great if top/bottom maximization could be done
> too. In pa
Hi Doug,
Great Feature !
Just one comment which I think that it can be improved:
Apparently right now it just does windo snapping in the right/left
sides. It would be great if top/bottom maximization could be done too.
In particular, since my current monitor is huge, I would also love
havi
On 09/22/2014 10:20 AM, Iain Patterson wrote:
...
Windows gives a visual hint when a window is
going to snap and resize. One could argue that
the hint is subtle and too slow to appear but it
is there.
MS developers may shoehorn their captive
audience into all kinds of behaviour and get
aw
Quoth Yury Tarasievich,
First, you get your window size changed *unexpectedly*. Who pays to
attention to those "end boxes", really? Should one treat the
half-visible "end boxes" as something, examining which is obligatory
for the successful operation completion? Those boxes are just (useful)
hin
On 09/22/2014 08:18 AM, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
On 09/22/2014 12:06 AM, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
...
Snap is only the intermediate result here, triggering the final result.
The size of the window isn't changed until after the move is completed.
So it's even worse, on two accounts.
First, y
On 09/22/2014 12:06 AM, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> Wait, does this change the window size when move's in progress, too?
> Then it's not "snapping" at all, and the term used is very confusing.
> More precisely, it's something like "half-maximise when edge is hit"
> or "half-fill when edge-snapped".
>
Wait, does this change the window size when
move's in progress, too?
Then it's not "snapping" at all, and the term
used is very confusing.
More precisely, it's something like
"half-maximise when edge is hit" or "half-fill
when edge-snapped".
Snap is only the intermediate result here,
triggerin
18 matches
Mail list logo
