From: Iain Patterson
Use the same logic used by xfwm4, metacity et al to replace an existing
window manager on the screen and allow other window managers to replace
us, as defined by the ICCCM 2.0:
http://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.6/doc/xorg-docs/specs/ICCCM/icccm.html
Communication with the Wi
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013, Carlos R. Mafra escribió:
> On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:56:40 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R.
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013, Yaroslav Fedevych escribió:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:54 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > The other thing is that WINGs theming is severely limited, if not even
> > simply broken when trying to integrate it with applications using other
> > widget sets like gtk+ and qt. The latt
On Thu, 05 Sep 2013, Rodolfo kix Garcia escribió:
> On Sun, 01 Sep 2013, Yaroslav Fedevych escribió:
>
> > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:54 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > > The other thing is that WINGs theming is severely limited, if not even
> > > simply broken when trying to integrate it with applic
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Paul Seelig wrote:
If i am not completely mistaken, this precedes MS Windows. I do not
Mac OS did support it before Windows using the Command key instead of
Control. Don't know if it was used before that but maybe there are even
older implementations.
commercial UNIX va
On 09/02/2013 12:13 AM, SJS wrote:
> I'd argue that this is not an _industry_ standard, only a _Microsoft_
> standard. And if I wanted the Microsoft UX, I'd use Microsoft Windows,
> thankyouverymuch.
>
If i am not completely mistaken, this precedes MS Windows. I do not
really bother using Windows
begin quoting Paul Seelig as of Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 01:54:42PM +0200:
[chop]
> And while we are at it, there are some more feature enhancements which
> would be very worthwhile to be added, but which strangely enough nobody
> ever seems to have bothered about yet:
>
> - Enable copy'n'paste via i
On 09/01/2013 08:22 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> I don't think that "other window managers do" is a reason to include
> code doing exoteric stuff and used once or twice in a lifetime
>
I guess it is a matter of perspective. Sometimes less is not more, even
if it might appear so when having a first
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:56:40 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > >
> > > > When was the last time you w
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> >
> > > When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager?
> > >
> >
> > Speaking of me: did i
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> > When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager?
> >
>
> Speaking of me: did it every time I was interested in a window manager
> development enough t
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager?
>
Speaking of me: did it every time I was interested in a window manager
development enough to run a bleeding edge version of it, to compare
behaviours when anything went
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 13:54:42 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 11:32 AM, Iain Patterson wrote:
> > Quoth I,
> >
> >> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
> >> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
> >> window managers (or ano
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:54 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> The other thing is that WINGs theming is severely limited, if not even
> simply broken when trying to integrate it with applications using other
> widget sets like gtk+ and qt. The latter can both be tricked to take on
> that NeXTish look (whi
On 08/29/2013 11:32 AM, Iain Patterson wrote:
> Quoth I,
>
>> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
>> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
>> window managers (or another wmaker) to replace wmaker in the same way.
>
>From a user's point
Yaroslav Fedevych escribió:
On 29 sie 2013, at 11:37, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 at 10:32:40 +0100, Iain Patterson wrote:
Quoth I,
This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
--replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
wind
On 29 sie 2013, at 11:37, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 at 10:32:40 +0100, Iain Patterson wrote:
>> Quoth I,
>>
>>> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
>>> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
>>> window managers (or
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 at 10:32:40 +0100, Iain Patterson wrote:
> Quoth I,
>
> >This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
> >--replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
> >window managers (or another wmaker) to replace wmaker in the same way.
>
>
Quoth I,
This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the
--replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those
window managers (or another wmaker) to replace wmaker in the same way.
Any interest in this kind of stuff?
I forgot to label the email as conta
Alas the BTS doesn't appear to be working at the
moment so I can't reference it.
From 1e8f636da413612e057d35cab889a66b8d5784c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Iain Patterson
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:57:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Replace and be replaced.
Use the same logic used by xfwm4,
20 matches
Mail list logo
