On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> Try this:
>
> AC_ARG_ENABLE([lcov],
> [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-lcov[=output-directory]], [enable coverage
> data generation using LCOV (GCC only) @<:@default=no@:>@])],
> [],
> [enable_lcov=no])
>
> AS_IF([test "x$enable_lcov
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> i'm trying to integrate lcov at least a bit. i've gotten this far, and
> it completely doesn't work:
Try this:
AC_ARG_ENABLE([lcov],
[AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-lcov[=output-directory]], [enable coverage data
generation using LCO
hi,
as usual, i might add ;)
i'm trying to integrate lcov at least a bit. i've gotten this far, and
it completely doesn't work:
dnl LCOV
dnl
enable_lcov=no
AC_ARG_ENABLE([lcov],
[AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-lcov[=output-directory]], [enable coverage data
generation using LCOV (GCC only)
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> > and this unconditionally links libbsd to every binary, even those not
> > needing it...
>
> One easy fix for that is to grab ax_check_linker_flags.m4[1] and add
> this rule to configure.ac:
>
> AX_CHECK_LINKER_FLAGS([-Wl,--as-needed],
> [LDFL
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:34:50AM +0200, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
>
> and this unconditionally links libbsd to every binary, even those not
> needing it...
One easy fix for that is to grab ax_check_linker_flags.m4[1] and add
this rule to configure.ac:
AX_CHECK_LINKER_FLAGS([-Wl,--as-needed],
[LDFL
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> Maybe. What you'll probably end up doing is providing fallback
> implementations if HAVE_STRLCAT is not defined, so no matter what the
> functions will exist. And in that case, the prototypes will have to be
> provided in some local .h file.
yes, this
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 06:32:20PM +0200, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Brad Jorsch wrote:
>
> > Is there really a need to define HAVE_LIBBSD? All we care about is
> > HAVE_STRLCAT, no matter how it is available.
>
> on the bsds (where these functions are in libc), they can be had
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Brad Jorsch wrote:
> >i need someone to turn
> >AC_CHECK_FUNC(strlcat, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STRLCAT, 1, Check for strlcat))
> >into something along the lines of
> >
> >if (strlcat is in libc)
> > define HAVE_STRLCAT
> >else if (strlcat is in libbsd)
> > define HAVE_S
On 21.09.2010 12:51, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
>
>i need someone to turn
>AC_CHECK_FUNC(strlcat, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STRLCAT, 1, Check for strlcat))
>into something along the lines of
>
>if (strlcat is in libc)
> define HAVE_STRLCAT
>else if (strlcat is in libbsd)
> define HAVE_STRLCAT
> define HA
On 21.09.2010 13:49, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> > if (strlcat is in libc)
> > define HAVE_STRLCAT
> > else if (strlcat is in libbsd)
> > define HAVE_STRLCAT
> > define HAVE_LIBBSD
> > add -lbsd to LIBS (wutil li
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> > if (strlcat is in libc)
> > define HAVE_STRLCAT
> > else if (strlcat is in libbsd)
> > define HAVE_STRLCAT
> > define HAVE_LIBBSD
> > add -lbsd to LIBS (wutil libs)
> > else
> > just move along
> >
> > and likewi
On 21.09.2010 12:51, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
hi,
i found out that that (at least) several linuxes ship libbsd, which
(among other things) have strlcat/strlcpy. it would be preferable to
pick these up instead of the bundled ones.
i need someone to turn
AC_CHECK_FUNC(strlcat, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STRLCAT,
hi,
i found out that that (at least) several linuxes ship libbsd, which
(among other things) have strlcat/strlcpy. it would be preferable to
pick these up instead of the bundled ones.
i need someone to turn
AC_CHECK_FUNC(strlcat, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STRLCAT, 1, Check for strlcat))
into something al
13 matches
Mail list logo
