Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-05 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013, Carlos R. Mafra escribió: > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:56:40 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R.

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-05 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013, Yaroslav Fedevych escribió: > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:54 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > > The other thing is that WINGs theming is severely limited, if not even > > simply broken when trying to integrate it with applications using other > > widget sets like gtk+ and qt. The latt

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-05 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas
On Thu, 05 Sep 2013, Rodolfo kix Garcia escribió: > On Sun, 01 Sep 2013, Yaroslav Fedevych escribió: > > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:54 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > > > The other thing is that WINGs theming is severely limited, if not even > > > simply broken when trying to integrate it with applic

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-02 Thread BALATON Zoltan
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Paul Seelig wrote: If i am not completely mistaken, this precedes MS Windows. I do not Mac OS did support it before Windows using the Command key instead of Control. Don't know if it was used before that but maybe there are even older implementations. commercial UNIX va

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Paul Seelig
On 09/02/2013 12:13 AM, SJS wrote: > I'd argue that this is not an _industry_ standard, only a _Microsoft_ > standard. And if I wanted the Microsoft UX, I'd use Microsoft Windows, > thankyouverymuch. > If i am not completely mistaken, this precedes MS Windows. I do not really bother using Windows

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread SJS
begin quoting Paul Seelig as of Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 01:54:42PM +0200: [chop] > And while we are at it, there are some more feature enhancements which > would be very worthwhile to be added, but which strangely enough nobody > ever seems to have bothered about yet: > > - Enable copy'n'paste via i

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Paul Seelig
On 09/01/2013 08:22 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > I don't think that "other window managers do" is a reason to include > code doing exoteric stuff and used once or twice in a lifetime > I guess it is a matter of perspective. Sometimes less is not more, even if it might appear so when having a first

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:56:40 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote: > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote: > > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > > > > > When was the last time you w

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Yaroslav Fedevych
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:54 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > > > When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager? > > > > > > > Speaking of me: did i

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 21:23:02 +0200, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote: > On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager? > > > > Speaking of me: did it every time I was interested in a window manager > development enough t

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Yaroslav Fedevych
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 19:22 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager? > Speaking of me: did it every time I was interested in a window manager development enough to run a bleeding edge version of it, to compare behaviours when anything went

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 13:54:42 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > On 08/29/2013 11:32 AM, Iain Patterson wrote: > > Quoth I, > > > >> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the > >> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those > >> window managers (or ano

Re: wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Yaroslav Fedevych
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 13:54 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > The other thing is that WINGs theming is severely limited, if not even > simply broken when trying to integrate it with applications using other > widget sets like gtk+ and qt. The latter can both be tricked to take on > that NeXTish look (whi

wmaker advancements and enhancements [was: Replace and be replaced]

2013-09-01 Thread Paul Seelig
On 08/29/2013 11:32 AM, Iain Patterson wrote: > Quoth I, > >> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the >> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those >> window managers (or another wmaker) to replace wmaker in the same way. > >From a user's point