At 10:32 AM 1/20/2009, you wrote:
>Well, it's not like Roberts had a copy of the oath to study from
>beforehand. Bush had the Constitution shredded years ago.
It's gotta still be on the internet somewhere.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
Sunshine wrote:
From: Mark Sunshine
Subject: Re: [What] Oath
To: wnndl@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 11:43 AM
Headline in the conservative sphere " Doh!bama!"
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Allen Heald
wrote:
Mary Block wrote:
> That was bad! Th
Headline in the conservative sphere " Doh!bama!"
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Allen Heald wrote:
>
> Mary Block wrote:
> > That was bad! The phrases were badly divided and didn't seem to be what
> > Obama was expecting.
>
> Gonna be a long 4 years with this WBoma guy, ain't it?
>
>
>
Mary Block wrote:
> That was bad! The phrases were badly divided and didn't seem to be what
> Obama was expecting.
Gonna be a long 4 years with this WBoma guy, ain't it?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
Twix. [record screech sound] "Need a moment?"
--
Steven Otte
steveno...@att.net
--- On Tue, 1/20/09, Mark Sunshine wrote:
From: Mark Sunshine
Subject: Re: [What] Oath
To: wnndl@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 12:44 PM
I see a Snickers commercial -- or ... yo
>
> --
> Steven Otte
> steveno...@att.net
>
> --- On *Tue, 1/20/09, Mary Block * wrote:
>
> From: Mary Block
> Subject: RE: [What] Oath
> To: wnndl@googlegroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 11:54 AM
>
>
> As was just said on CNN, Justice Robe
Well, it's not like Roberts had a copy of the oath to study from beforehand.
Bush had the Constitution shredded years ago.
--
Steven Otte
steveno...@att.net
--- On Tue, 1/20/09, Mary Block wrote:
From: Mary Block
Subject: RE: [What!!!!] Oath
To: wnndl@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, Ja
taking the oath.
Thank God and Greyhound (Executive One) he's gone!!
_
From: wnndl@googlegroups.com [mailto:wn...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Dennis Brumm
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:45 AM
To: wnndl@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [What] Oath
That was ba
>That was bad! The phrases were badly divided and didn't seem to be
>what Obama was expecting.
As president a lot of what he was expecting will be mangled.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"World Ne
That was bad! The phrases were badly divided and didn't seem to be what
Obama was expecting.
_
From: wnndl@googlegroups.com [mailto:wn...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
kbrab...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:08 AM
To: wnndl@googlegroups.com
Subject: [What] Oath
Is it m
10 matches
Mail list logo
