Pour être en première sur linuxfr.org et être intégré dans les
distributions, il faut que la version soit déclarée "stable". Après si le
programme est bogué, c'est moyen pour notre image.
Nous n'avons eu que des bons retours sur notre beta3. Le programme est
suffisament stable à mon avis :-)
> PS: Je ne pense pas qu'il soit pertinant de sortir un beta 4, car la
> version "officielle" incluerait alors encore de nouvelles
> fonctionnalités...
Pour être en première sur linuxfr.org et être intégré dans les
distributions, il faut que la version soit déclarée "stable". Après si le
programme
hello,
we already have talk about the 0.7 release. In my mind, we should fastly
release a version. Yes it's difficult since project is really active and
since we do not have enough man power to maintain separates branches.
In my mind, release 0.7 should have been released from a while, but no
Salut,
nous en avons mainte fois débattu, mais je pense qu'il est grand temps
de sortir une version 0.7. C'est vrai que c'est difficile compte-tenu de
l'activité du projet et du manque de "ressources humaines" pour gérer
des branches séparées (ce qui pénalisent l'activité).
à mon avis, la ve
Le 28.03.2006 09:42, Matthieu Fertré a écrit :
>
>> What is the 0.7 version ? There won't be any features more in it, most
>> of (if not all) bugs are fixed, so why don't we release this version, so
>> that we won't loose time to maintain 2 branches...
>> If we want Wormux to be integrated in more
> A vouloir sortir une version trop parfaite, on la
> sortira jamais cette
> putain de version, surtout que visiblement personne
> ne s'est même rendu
> compte que le parachute était remplacé par les
> ballons de baudruche de
> YecKim...
Désolé, je suis passé a dapper dernièrement et je
n'avai
What is the 0.7 version ? There won't be any features more in it, most
of (if not all) bugs are fixed, so why don't we release this version, so
that we won't loose time to maintain 2 branches...
If we want Wormux to be integrated in more distros, we have to release a
stable version and the 0.7 b
Le 27.03.2006 10:59, Matthieu Fertré a écrit :
> Victor STINNER a écrit :
>
>>> If everybody is agree, I suggest to release the 0.7 version from
>>> revision 587. We need to release soon to be integrated fastly in
>>> distributions!!
>>>
>>
>>
>> I would prefer "0.7beta4" :-) I think that this
Victor STINNER a écrit :
If everybody is agree, I suggest to release the 0.7 version from
revision 587. We need to release soon to be integrated fastly in
distributions!!
I would prefer "0.7beta4" :-) I think that this release is a major one, so
we have to test it the more as possible.
> If everybody is agree, I suggest to release the 0.7 version from
> revision 587. We need to release soon to be integrated fastly in
> distributions!!
I would prefer "0.7beta4" :-) I think that this release is a major one, so
we have to test it the more as possible.
Haypo
__
Hello,
If everybody is agree, I suggest to release the 0.7 version from
revision 587. We need to release soon to be integrated fastly in
distributions!!
In my mind, we should release more often. For example, we can release a
0.7.1 when we have one or two more weapons and beautiful explosions
BUT I need graphism !!!The first weapons I will probably make are the rebounding forever ball
and the devil launching fire (perhaps we can use the FreeBSD mascot"beastie") ?For the "rebonding forever ball" that's simple, I give a simple model in 3 sizes.Good idea for the freeBSD mascot.
But How we
Hi,
in my mind, the 0.7 version is now ready (perhaps there are still some
bugs on weapons, so test it a lot -- and do not forget to "svn up &&
make clean && ./autogen.sh && make" ;-)
so I plan to implement quickly new weapons inspired from web page
http://www.wormux.org/wiki/brainstorming.p
13 matches
Mail list logo
