Jens Geile wrote:
Any suggestions? Objections?
IMHO too complicated, and it doesn't differ much from separate files for each
update (but read my other replies to see more reasoning and perhaps a solution).
The big advantage is that we can just add new updates under the last one. When
using
> > Any suggestions? Objections?
> IMHO too complicated, and it doesn't differ much from separate files for each
> update (but read my other replies to see more reasoning and perhaps a
> solution).
The big advantage is that we can just add new updates under the last one. When
using separate pack
Jens Geile wrote:
(...)
Any suggestions? Objections?
IMHO too complicated, and it doesn't differ much from separate files for
each update (but read my other replies to see more reasoning and perhaps
a solution).
--
Tomek
---
SF.Net em
Tim Fournet wrote:
So... What you're asking for is WSUS ;)
It would be interesting to see wpkg modified to do the same thing, but
I'm not sure if it will work smoothly. You'd need someone to manually
edit the packages.xml with each update and place the KB files into the
right share. Could be d
Jens Geile wrote:
So... What you're asking for is WSUS ;)
More or less, yes. But I unattended+wpkg is going to run off of a Linux server
and there wont be a Windows server in the network. So WSUS isnt an option.
I've read somewhere, that if you go to update.microsoft.com and install
a new v
> So... What you're asking for is WSUS ;)
More or less, yes. But I unattended+wpkg is going to run off of a Linux server
and there wont be a Windows server in the network. So WSUS isnt an option.
> It would be interesting to see wpkg modified to do the same thing, but I'm
> not sure if it will w
So... What you're asking for is WSUS ;)
It would be interesting to see wpkg modified to do the same thing, but
I'm not sure if it will work smoothly. You'd need someone to manually
edit the packages.xml with each update and place the KB files into the
right share. Could be done, but it would be
> One alternative would be to slipstream all of your Office updates into your
> office install point. Not sure if that would be more work or not, but it
> should go faster.
Speed isnt an issue here. The problem is that i want to be able to install
updates _after_ Office was already installed. S
One alternative would be to slipstream all of your Office updates into
your office install point. Not sure if that would be more work or not,
but it should go faster.
-Original Message-
From: Jens Geile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:57 AM
To: wpkg-users@list
Hi,
been some time since I last had the chance to do some work on my
unattended+wpkg setup but this thing here is really bugging me and I would
_really_ like it to be implemented since it would make things _a lot_ easier
for all of us.
A current package entry would look something like this:
10 matches
Mail list logo
