> > > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Adding_Extensions_using_the_Windows_Registry
> > I read that page and i must say: "What the fuck are those idiots doing?"
> > The documentation is totally useless and either i'm too stupid to follow
> > the incomplete instructions or this just doesn't wo
Please reply using this URL only: http://bugs.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-09 23:13 ---
Comment #2 concerned bug 6 (now closed).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
Please reply using this URL only: http://bugs.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-09 22:57 ---
Thanks a lot, I will add it to 0.9.3-test1 soon.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
Please reply using this URL only: http://bugs.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-09 22:35 ---
Thanks, will be added to 0.9.3-test1 soon (I didn't even think it could be that
short).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wpkg.org/userprefs.
WPKG 0.9.2 has been released.
This is a stable release.
Changes:
WPKG-0.9.2-test1 released as 0.9.2 (stable) - no changes.
* fixed bug 6 (regenerate wpkg.xml)
* fixed bug 11 (execute="once" broken)
* some check types were removed because they introduced many bugs and
weren't tested very well:
> > This is not a wpkg issue at all.
> I never said it was, did i? I just asked if someone knew how it is done.
>
> > Go check this page:
> > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Adding_Extensions_using_the_Windows_Registry
> > You can put the extensions in any folder u like and then update the
>
> It is not file oriented, but install package oriented. It does a check (or
> several checks) in order to determin, whether a program is installed. If one
> of the checks fail, wpkg assumes, that the program is not installed and
> triggers the install command(s). It does not install files as su
