On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 09:41 +0200, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> > There is one slight problem with that: WPKG Client and wpkg.js are not
> > very well integrated (it will change slowly in the future; right now,
> > there are even problems wi
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:51 +0200, Falko Trojahn wrote:
> > Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
> > In chel di` si favelave...
> >
> >> There is one slight problem with that: WPKG Client and wpkg.js are not
> >> very well integrated (it will change slowly in the future; right now,
> >> there are even probl
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 12:04 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
...
> >
> > Yeah - that's true - the service would have to do a read on the server
> > every few minutes (this could be configured in the service).
> > I don't think it will be noticeable even with a large number of clients.
>
> And by
Brad Langhorst schrieb:
(...)
>>> The advantage of having a file on the server is that the admin does not
>>> have to touch every machine (or use psexec) to get them all to sync up.
>>> You bring up a good point about sets of machines... That would be a
>>> PITA to deal with using psexec too.
>>
Falko Trojahn schrieb:
>> Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
>> In chel di` si favelave...
>>
>>> There is one slight problem with that: WPKG Client and wpkg.js are not
>>> very well integrated (it will change slowly in the future; right now,
>>> there are even problems with restarts initiated by wpkg.js
> Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> There is one slight problem with that: WPKG Client and wpkg.js are not
>> very well integrated (it will change slowly in the future; right now,
>> there are even problems with restarts initiated by wpkg.js etc.).
>> This means, we wou
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
> There is one slight problem with that: WPKG Client and wpkg.js are not
> very well integrated (it will change slowly in the future; right now,
> there are even problems with restarts initiated by wpkg.js etc.).
> This means, we would have