Mandi! Michael J. Kidd
In chel di` si favelave...
> I think you mis-understood my initial complaint...
Hem, yes, i think so. ;)
> server's packages.xml. This doesn't help me though, because Wpkg still
> uses the commands that are in the local wpkg.xml file. So, I get stuck
> finding some ot
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
> What do you mean by "copy installers on local machine"?
Literally that...
> To copy a 600 MB Office installer or what (BTW, you can always do it
> with xcopy)?
...but clearly i've not considered Office... ;(((
Sorry, probably mine was
B Royles wrote:
> Ok, so time goes on, and I need to uninstall Firefox from a few systems
> for whatever reason.. ( not upgrade ) and during the uninstall, I figure
> out that it should be -msa on the uninstall vice -ms. I update it on my
> server's packages.xml. This doesn't help me though, beca
Subject: Re: [wpkg-users] Change of method of running wpkg
Ok, so time goes on, and I need to uninstall Firefox from a few systems
for whatever reason.. ( not upgrade ) and during the uninstall, I figure
out that it should be -msa on the uninstall vice -ms. I update it on my
server&#
Ok, so time goes on, and I need to uninstall Firefox from a few systems
for whatever reason.. ( not upgrade ) and during the uninstall, I figure
out that it should be -msa on the uninstall vice -ms. I update it on my
server's packages.xml. This doesn't help me though, because Wpkg still
uses the
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> 1) it is right that uninstall have to be done with the information in
> %SYSTEMDIR%/wpkg.xml, because we have to uninstall the current
> software, not the newer version. ;)
>
I think you mis-understood my initial complaint...
Lets say I install Firefox. At the time of
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> Yes, the next version should install/deinstall/upgrade properly.
>
> Hem, probably there's a misunderstood.
>
> I'm not speaking abount Wpkg installer (i used it as an example), but
> generally on all software i
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
> Yes, the next version should install/deinstall/upgrade properly.
Hem, probably there's a misunderstood.
I'm not speaking abount Wpkg installer (i used it as an example), but
generally on all software installed.
Resuming:
1) it is right th
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>>> This pose a 'common practice' question: seems to be better, very
>>> better, to have installer 'versioned' (WPKGSetup-0.90.msi and not
>>> WPKGSetup.msi, for example), and not to delete old installers too
>>> ear
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
> > This pose a 'common practice' question: seems to be better, very
> > better, to have installer 'versioned' (WPKGSetup-0.90.msi and not
> > WPKGSetup.msi, for example), and not to delete old installers too
> > early.
> I agree, but it won't
B Royles (Staff) wrote:
>> Anyway, with Active Directory, it shouldn't be a problem - just remove
>> the package, and add a newer version. If it makes sense to use WPKG
>> Installer with AD is another question...
>
>
> Ok I will bite.
>
>
> I was going to move to the wpkg installer so I cou
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Michael J. Kidd
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> As long as the profiles are the same between your current running
>> instance of wpkg, and the new xml you plan to implement w/ the WPKG
>> installer, I don't believe you'll have any issues. The only time I've
Mandi! Michael J. Kidd
In chel di` si favelave...
> As long as the profiles are the same between your current running
> instance of wpkg, and the new xml you plan to implement w/ the WPKG
> installer, I don't believe you'll have any issues. The only time I've
> run into issues is if I've f
Mandi! B Royles (Staff)
In chel di` si favelave...
> I need to do two separate things
For the first you have to creare a wpkg installerpackage, the second i've
solved using a wpkg package for the wpkg configurations (called
wpkg-settings) and i realod the conf file here.
Probably with this setu
I'd add the wpkg installer as a package in wpkg, then the next reboot,
your startup script launches WPKG which in turn installs the WPKG
installer. Have the startup script touch a file on the local harddrive
to indicate that the WPKG installer has run so that the startup script
no longer launches
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
J. Kidd
Sent: 18 January 2007 12:39
To: wpkg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wpkg-users] Change of method of running wpkg
I'd add the wpkg installer as a package in wpkg, then the next reboot,
your startup script launches WPKG which in turn installs the
added more chum to the
> water?
>
>
> Ta,
> Brett
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
> J. Kidd
> Sent: 18 January 2007 12:39
> To: wpkg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [wpkg-users] Cha
17 matches
Mail list logo
