[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 --- Comment #25 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 14:55:51 --- Created an attachment (id=93) --> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=93) wpkg.js 1.0-rc5 patched with loglevels PS: our intention was: with loglevel=7 - only

[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #88 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 --- Comment #23 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 13:37:57 --- I was running the wpkg.js from #6 with loglevel=27 and i got all those package messages i dont want/need. I checked your logmessages from #22 and dinfo/sinfo/cinfo look fin

[wpkg-users] [Bug 93] 64-bit OS support announcement

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 13:01:48 --- @Falko: I just tried to reproduce that problem on my reference VMWare installation. It's running on XP SP2 (not SP1 as your one). I was not able to create such an error. T

[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #89 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 --- Comment #22 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 12:44:22 --- Created an attachment (id=91) --> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=91) All logmessages from wpkg.js, sorted #20: don't know ... zuzi in poland? -- Configu

[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 --- Comment #21 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 12:43:02 --- Created an attachment (id=90) --> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=90) Loglevel patch against wpkg-1.0-rc5 Patch for more loglevels: check,debug,packages,sys

[wpkg-users] [Bug 93] 64-bit OS support announcement

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 12:24:50 --- That's actually a good question. It seems to happen when reading the uninstall keys. In worst case this could lead to a situation that WPKG claims that package are not ins

[wpkg-users] [Bug 93] 64-bit OS support announcement

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 --- Comment #9 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 11:49:30 --- Rainer, should I be concerned about that (using wpkg.js-1.0-rc5 on XPSP1): 2007-12-18 11:02:26, ERROR : Error when searching registry sub-keys at 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsof

[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 --- Comment #20 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 11:02:37 --- > For your convenience, here comes a zip file with patched wpkg.js > (Tomasz, the patch is in attachment above ;-) and 4 files with > only the messages sorted acco

[wpkg-users] [Bug 93] 64-bit OS support announcement

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 --- Comment #8 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 11:00:27 --- What should I say? It works fine without the wrapper on my 32-bit system. ;) Moreover, you are totally wrong, the files are there ;) -- Configure bugmail: http:/

[wpkg-users] [Bug 93] 64-bit OS support announcement

2007-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Co