[wpkg-users] [Bug 103] Handling absence of config.xml

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #99 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[wpkg-users] [Bug 103] Handling absence of config.xml

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-18 09:21:00 --- Created an attachment (id=102) --> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=102) Full package, fixed for bug 103 and 104 - changes for 1.1 milestone release Change no

[wpkg-users] [Bug 103] Handling absence of config.xml

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #101 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[wpkg-users] [Bug 103] Handling absence of config.xml

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #102 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[wpkg-users] [Bug 103] Handling absence of config.xml

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-18 09:41:42 --- Created an attachment (id=105) --> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=105) Diff between version 1.0 RC7 and the updated 1.0 RC8 Same thing - just the difference

[wpkg-users] [Bug 103] Handling absence of config.xml

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-18 09:42:53 --- Created an attachment (id=106) --> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=106) Diff between version 1.1 M1 and the updated 1.1.0 M2 Same thing, just the differences

[wpkg-users] [Bug 103] Handling absence of config.xml

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[wpkg-users] [Bug 104] (Trivial absence of opening quote in "Adding settings node")

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #2 fr

[wpkg-users] [Bug 102] registry checks fail if the value name contains backslashes

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[wpkg-users] [Bug 42] add a time parameter

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #18

[wpkg-users] [Bug 96] Crash/ exception when checking the value of a non-existent registry entry

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #5 fro

[wpkg-users] [Bug 94] /remove should remove dependend packages and/or profiles

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #8 fro

Re: [wpkg-users] Logging enhancement request

2008-02-18 Thread Falko Trojahn
grubi --> 16.02.2008 15:39: > Hi Florian, >> You could add the date to the filename, see config.xml for details. > That is what we already did. Currently we have > [HOSTNAME]-[]-[MM]-[DD] which of course do not prevent the log to be > overwritten during necessary reboots. Sure we could also

[wpkg-users] [Bug 92] Enhanced Logging

2008-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #31 fr

[wpkg-users] %SOFTWARE% variable

2008-02-18 Thread Marc Cuypers
Hi, I recently discovered wpkg and i'm evaluating it. It seems to work quite good. I'm using wpkg 1.0-rc7. But... i have a problem. In the silent installs the variable %SOFTWARE% is used. I tried to set it with the wpkg-client (general/wpkg variable). But it seems not to be expanded. Is

Re: [wpkg-users] Logging enhancement request

2008-02-18 Thread grubi
Hi Falko. > There has been much discussion about that on the list already. > To have something like this (you can call it log rotation) I just use > [HOSTNAME]-[mm].log and sort the log directory by time. So I get all the > log files, containing the whole installation process. There is not much >

Re: [wpkg-users] %SOFTWARE% variable

2008-02-18 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Marc Marc Cuypers wrote: > In the silent installs the variable %SOFTWARE% is used. I tried to set > it with the wpkg-client (general/wpkg variable). But it seems not to be > expanded. Is there a problem with this expansion. No, no known problem with the expansion and I use this feature d

Re: [wpkg-users] Logging enhancement request

2008-02-18 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi Grubi grubi wrote: > No sure if it is a good idea to integarte log rotation directly into > wpkg. This one could easily be done by regularily scheduling a simple > jscript deleting all files older than a specific date. Additionally you > could also do things like packing old logs and move th

Re: [wpkg-users] %SOFTWARE% variable

2008-02-18 Thread Rainer Meier
Hi all Gerd Ott wrote: > I also was confused, because variables defined in wpkg-client are not > expanded, if you test your installation from the command line manually > with "/debug" flag. > So I think for testing/debugging packages with variables defined in > the client one has to use the wpkg-c

Re: [wpkg-users] %SOFTWARE% variable

2008-02-18 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Rainer Meier schrieb: (...) >> Second question: >> Where does the wpkg-client save its configuration data? > > This can be answered by some WPKG client developers ;-) Yes, this problem is currently being investigated. We're still unsure where WPKG Client stores its data. We highly suspect is

Re: [wpkg-users] %SOFTWARE% variable

2008-02-18 Thread Gerd Ott
Hi all, I also was confused, because variables defined in wpkg-client are not expanded, if you test your installation from the command line manually with "/debug" flag. So I think for testing/debugging packages with variables defined in the client one has to use the wpkg-client and set "Show" in "

Re: [wpkg-users] ++Mailshell: Re: Logging enhancement request

2008-02-18 Thread grubi
Hi Rainer, > I am currently thinking about introducing a new "appendLog" parameter > to config.xml which is set to "false" by default. This is exactly what I would vote for. This one I would use with [HOSTNAME]-[]-[MM]-[DD] and have one file per host per day where all messages are included