Adam Williams schrieb:
> ok thanks for the clarification, I wasn't trying to sound like an ass in
> my previous message. I just know at my employer I've had users who
> think they know how to fix computers (but all they can do is break them)
> do more harm then good, but since we went to roamin
ok thanks for the clarification, I wasn't trying to sound like an ass in my
previous message. I just know at my employer I've had users who think they
know how to fix computers (but all they can do is break them) do more harm then
good, but since we went to roaming profiles/active directory
ok thanks for the clarification, I wasn't trying to sound like an ass in
my previous message. I just know at my employer I've had users who
think they know how to fix computers (but all they can do is break them)
do more harm then good, but since we went to roaming profiles/active
directory/et
Maybe it's none of my business, but it sounds like you aren't an IT staff at
your employer and you are handling IT affairs? Or, if you're not a server
administrator then when are you trying to do server administrative tasks? Or
you're a quasi/unofficial-IT person working in a remote office
Maybe it's none of my business, but it sounds like you aren't an IT
staff at your employer and you are handling IT affairs? Or, if you're
not a server administrator then when are you trying to do server
administrative tasks? Or you're a quasi/unofficial-IT person working in
a remote office?
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145
--- Comment #5 from Jason Oster 2009-04-21 16:38:10 ---
Falko, this sounds similar to a bug I reported earlier, but haven't looked
into: Bug 137
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
>
> well he said that his guest account was prompting for a password. but
> see, XP/Vista/whatever is already connected to the server as a certain
> username, and then you are also trying to connect as guest (but it may
> not matter since wpkg is connecting as the system user and not whomever
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145
--- Comment #4 from Falko Trojahn 2009-04-21
16:30:39 ---
Helo Rainer,
I've tested with 1.1.0-M22 (release 53). The dependancy error seems to be
resolved, but a more seriously one arises after removal of a certain dependent
package:
Removing pa
oh and guest account = nobody in the [global] section also.
-
wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/
___
wpkg-users mailing list
wpkg-users@
well he said that his guest account was prompting for a password. but
see, XP/Vista/whatever is already connected to the server as a certain
username, and then you are also trying to connect as guest (but it may
not matter since wpkg is connecting as the system user and not whomever
he is logg
Adam Williams schrieb:
> whats your smb.conf? sounds like you have a samba misconfiguration.
Hmm, I wonder - were there any people reporting this issue with Windows
domain controllers/servers?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
Chris Wilcox schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a number of sites who have a Linux-based Internet cache/proxy
> with some preconfigured shared drives for storing user work
> (school/education).
>
> None have any other servers on site so I was hoping to make use of one
> of these shared drives for
whats your smb.conf? sounds like you have a samba misconfiguration.
Chris Wilcox wrote:
Hi all,
I have a number of sites who have a Linux-based Internet cache/proxy
with some preconfigured shared drives for storing user work
(school/education).
None have any other servers on site so I was
Hi all,
I have a number of sites who have a Linux-based Internet cache/proxy with some
preconfigured shared drives for storing user work (school/education).
None have any other servers on site so I was hoping to make use of one of these
shared drives for wpkg. I can install, configure a
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
luca_mangane...@comune.trento.it schrieb:
> Tomasz Chmielewski scritti il 21/04/2009 11.48.40
>
>> It is possible now:
>
>> http://wpkg.org/Profiles.xml
>
>> If it's not clear for you, let me know.
>
> You don't understood me.
>
> I want a profile to be installed by *ALL*
luca_mangane...@comune.trento.it schrieb:
> Tomasz Chmielewski scritti il 21/04/2009 11.48.40
>
>> It is possible now:
>
>> http://wpkg.org/Profiles.xml
>
>> If it's not clear for you, let me know.
>
> You don't understood me.
>
> I want a profile to be installed by *ALL* clients that has the
Tomasz Chmielewski scritti il 21/04/2009 11.48.40
> It is possible now:
> http://wpkg.org/Profiles.xml
> If it's not clear for you, let me know.
You don't understood me.
I want a profile to be installed by *ALL* clients that has the WPKG
service, without specifying it in the hosts.xml.
I hav
luca_mangane...@comune.trento.it schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> it would be nice to set up a "default profile for all clients" in which you
> put packages to be installed to all clients.
It is possible now:
http://wpkg.org/Profiles.xml
If it's not clear for you, let me know.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
--
Hi,
it would be nice to set up a "default profile for all clients" in which you
put packages to be installed to all clients.
-
wpkg-users mailing list archives >> http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/
_
Mike Burgener wrote:
Hi all
How to proceed on upgrading a wpkg installation (server side) ?
kind regards
Mike
-
Usually it is as simple as copying the new version of WPKG.JS over the old one.
---
Stefan
-
Adam Williams wrote:
wpkg only runs on system start up, but you can use schedule tasks on the
control panel to have it run more often.
-
You can set up WPKG client to syncronize at startup or at shutdown, if you are
using ver
Mike Burgener schrieb:
> Hi all
>
> How to proceed on upgrading a wpkg installation (server side) ?
Copying a new wpkg.js over the old one should be enough.
What version of wpkg.js do you use now?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
