http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Rainer Meier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Jason Oster changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||parasy...@gmail.com
--- Comment #19 from Jason O
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #18 from Rainer Meier 2009-06-17 10:21:41 ---
> What about using minus "-" and plus "+" ?
The "minus" sign is already reserved as a version-separator (similar to a dot).
There are quite a number of applications that use this separator
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #17 from Daniel Dehennin 2009-06-17
08:42:34 ---
What about using minus "-" and plus "+" ?
1.0RC1 is lower than 1.0, why not using 1.0-1 ?
1.0MR1 is greater than 1.0, why not using 1.0+1 ?
Each RC, MR, a, b & co are greater or lower
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Meier 2009-06-16 19:49:27 ---
> The list of "volatile-version-markers" is nearly endless.
> I use an application which releases Maintenance Releases (MR) and Maintenance
> Packs (MP).
> MRs' are service packs and MPs' a
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #15 from Stefan Pendl 2009-06-16 18:02:14
---
The list of "volatile-version-markers" is nearly endless.
I use an application which releases Maintenance Releases (MR) and Maintenance
Packs (MP).
MRs' are service packs and MPs' are patc
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Rainer Meier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #149 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Malte Starostik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@malte.homeip.net
--- Comment #13 f
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Meier 2009-06-15 19:48:06 ---
> Hope the use of colons (:) instead of dots (.) is just a mistake, since
> currently the initial split is only done using dots.
Of course, my mistake - I use simple dots as well ;-)
The
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #11 from Stefan Pendl 2009-06-15 19:32:28
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> My personal recommendation is still to use just a colon-separated sequence of
> numbers.
Hope the use of colons (:) instead of dots (.) is just a mistake, sin
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Meier 2009-06-15 18:25:05 ---
Oh no... this was unexpected. Looks like this case hit a strange behavior of
the parseInt() method used internally.
parseInt(099) results in integer 0 (??)
while
parseInt(99) correctly reso
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Stefan Pendl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pendl2mega...@yahoo.de
--- Comment #9 from
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Rainer Meier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #148 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Meier 2009-06-15 10:33:40 ---
> What about this version comparaison:
> A B
> "1.35rc3" "1.35"
Well you're right. However I am not sure how to handle this. Usually an
appendix to the version number indicates an u
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Daniel Dehennin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.dehen...@ac-caen.fr
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Meier 2009-06-14 17:38:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=148)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=148)
New version comparison algorithm for testing.
Hi,
This report has been open for a while now. Finally I
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
--- Comment #2 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-15 17:23:31 ---
The really cool part about the debian version compare system is that I can even
use the full alphanumerical range for my version number.
For VLC I could even use "0.8.6f-0"
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Co
18 matches
Mail list logo
